R-29-12 Res Amendment of the IL Quality Management Plan Glen Oak EstatesRESOLUTION • a9
RESOLUTION
Amendment of the Illinois Quality Management Plan
Glen Oak Estates
WHEREAS, the Village of Lemont is requesting a change in FPA boundaries, an Amendment of the
Illinois Quality Management Plan petition needs to be completed and submitted; and
WHEREAS, said petition allows for the correction of a boundary map error to include a parcel of
land into the MWRDGC FPA that was incorrectly included in the Illinois American FPA.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Lemont
that the petition for the Amendment of the Illinois Quality Management Plan attached hereto is
hereby approved.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
LEMONT, COUNTIES OF COOK, WILL AND DuPAGE, ILLINOIS, on this 14th day of May, 2012.
Debby Blatzer
Paul Chialdikas
Clifford Miklos
Rick Sniegowski
Ronald Stapleton
Jeanette Virgilio
AYES
v
v4
Approved by me this 14th day of May, 2012.
Attest:
CHARLENE SMOLLEN, Village Clerk
NAYS PASSED ABSENT
CHARLENE SMOLLEN, Village Clerk
BRIAN K. REAVES, Village President
Approved as to form:
Jeff Stein, Village Attorney
Date:
AMENDMENT OF THE
ILLINOIS WATER QUALITY
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Village of Lemont
418 Main Street
Lemont, Illinois 60439
Phone: (630) 257 -1550
Fax: (630) 243 -0958
File No. 12181
This amendment request is filed pursuant to the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency's Procedures and Requirements in effect at this time for revising water quality
management plans. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the
application and to the best of my knowledge, such information is true, complete and
accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to request and.sub.mit an amendment
petition.
BEN WEHME1E1
Printed Name of Petitioner
May 14 , 2012
Date
Signature of Petitioner
File No. 12181
Revised 6-7-07 —1'age 2 °"3
Petitioner's Authorized Agent and Contact Person:
Name BEN WEHMEIER
Title VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR
Entity VILLAGE OF LEMONT
Address 418 MAIN STREET
City
Phone
LEMONT
( 630 ) 257-1590
State IL Zip 60439
Fax (630) 243-0958
Type of Amendment Requested (check all ithat apply)
New Treatment Facility/Discharge
Expanded. Plant Capacity
Dissolution of FPA
FPA Name Change
Other
X FPA Boundary Change
FPA Creation
Land Treatment System
Plant Phase-Out
CORRECTION OF SCRIVENERS ERROR ON FPA MAP
Identify all facility planning areas within 11/2 miles of requested amendment area and/or
applicant's facility planning area.
MWRDGC FPA
ILLINOIS : AMERICAN FPA
Revised 6-7-137 — Page3 of23
NOT APPLICABLE
Section B
To be completed for all amendment requests involving the prop sed
construction of a new wastewater or land treatment facility a dior
expansion (capacity modification) of an existing treatment cility.
1. Provide a summary of, and the need for, the requested amend ent. NOTE: Any
amendment application involving 1) a substantial change in a fac ty planning area,
100 or more acres, and/or 2) a new or expanded treatment fa ity, involving a
capacity increase of 0.25 mgd or 10 percent, should be ac 6mpanied by an up-to-
date facility plan.
2. Facility inforrnation
Name:
Ownership: Public Private Other
Owner's Name:
Operator:
Location:
City/Township/County:
3 Treatment Proce ses
A. Describ the wastewater treatment processes to be used
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 4 of 23
NOT APPLICABLE
B. For discharges to high duality and/or low flow water bodies.
Will the facility incorporate design components which maximize treatment reliabi y,
including process units in parallel which provide treatment redundancy in the ent of
main system malfunction or failure; effluent polishing lagoons incorporating etland
vegetation; and a preference for high-reliability technologies? Please de cribe.
4. Treatment Capacities
Design Flows-. Design Year for propose
Average Daily Flow: Current mgd
Maximum Daily Flow: Current mgd
flows
Proposed mgd
Proposed mgd
Actual Flows (based on most recent nual experience): Year
Measured average daily flow: mgd
Flow Components* a. Averag Sanitary mgd
b. Ave ge Infiltration mgd
c. Av rage Inflow mgd
+c = average daily flow
5. Receiving Waters k'arne and location:
Type: Stream Lake Well Injection Other
If other • escribe:
Estimate of verage annual upstream flow and 7-day, 10-year low flow of identified
receivin team: cfs
Inform ton Source:
Revised 6-7-07 —Page 5 of 23
NOT APPLICABLE
6. Discharge Location: Not Applicable
Latitude: Degrees Minutes Seconds
Longitude: Degrees Minutes Seconds
7. Area to Be Served: Provide a map of the • existing and proposed servic- area for the
new/expanded treatment facility at a scale of 1 inch = 2,000 feet.
Existing Service area: Total acres Populatio
Households Total P
Proposed Service Area: Total acres Popu tion
Households To: PE
By Year:
(NOTE: The proposed amendment rnust not exceed e population projections for
the twenty-year planning period set forth in the cur ntly approved facility plan or the
CMAP twenty year forecasts for the facility plan g area. CMAP may agree to
adjustments within the regional forecast total.
Developrnerit(s) to be Served: Describe di anticipated development that will be
served by the new and/or expanded tre tment facility. (For each development,
provide the following information: pre ect name, developer name, number and mix of
units for residential developments •and total acreage. For non-residential
development provide expected umber of employees. Please indicate project status
(i.e., planned, annexed, zon: • , under construction, construction completed, etc.).
Attach additional sheets needed.
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 6 of 23
NOT APPLICABLE
9. Permits/Variances NPDES Number: (Attach Cop
NPDES Permit applied for: No Yes Date applied for:
Land Application Construction Permit Number: (Attac Copy)
Land Application Permit applied for: No Yes Date applied for:
Has or will a variance from IEPA/IPCB Standards be required for the op ation of the
proposed facility? No Yes If yes, describe:
10. If the proposal is for a privately owned and operated fa ility, describe the type,
size, location and distance to nearest existing publi owned wastewater
sewer and treatment facility.
11. Provide the following information reg rding the anticipated costs for the
proposed facility modificationlcrea on.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Sludge Handling Facilities
Pump Stations
Interceptor Sewers
Collection Sewers
On-site and Alterna e Systems
Land Acquisition
Inspection/Co .truction Management $
Project Ma gement/Desigrt
Other
Estim ed Total Construction Cost: $
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 7 of 23
NOT APPLICABLE
12. Provide an estimate of annual operation, maintenance and replacement cost
for the proposed facility modification/creation.
Labor
Utilities
Materials
Outside Services
Equipment Replacement
Miscellaneous
Total Estimated Annual 0,1VI & R Costs $
13. Uniform Annual Equivalent Cost:
i4. how the proposed facility modificati nicreation will be financed.
Local Developer Contribution
!EPA Revolving Loan
General Obligation Bond
Revenue Bond
Special Taxing District
User Charges/Fees
Private Utility-Capital Fund
Other IEPA Funding
Other State Funding
Other Grants/Loan ees:
Total Anti pated Financing
Revised 6-7-07 —Page 8 of 23
NOT APPLICABLE
15. Describe any and all service alternatives which were examined including la
treatment to the requested amendment. Attach additional sheets as neede
16 How was cost effectiveness of the selecte..alternative determined? Attach
additional sheets as needed).
1 Anticipat- . environmental impacts associated with each altemative should also be presented for water
quality (surfa• and groundwater), wetlands, floodplains, prime agricultural lands, fish and wildlife, and
endangere and threatened species. Options for alternative discharge locations (e.g., to receiving waters with
greater di tion rations) should also be discussed.
Revised 6 -7 -07 — Page 9 of 23
Section C
_
To be completed for all amendment requests seeking facility/
planning area (FPA) creation and/or facility
planning area boundary modification.
1. Provide a summary of and the need for the requested amendment
NOTE: Any amendment application involving 1) a substantial change in a facility
planning area, 100 or more: acres, and or 2) a new or expanded treatment thdlity,
involving a capacity increase of 0.25 mgd or 10 percent, should be accompanied by
an up-to-date facility plan.
DUE TO A SCRIVENERS ERROR THAT OCCURRED SOMETIME IN MID-1970's,
THE SUBDIVISION OR FOX HILLS—UNIT 2 WAS INADVERTENTLY INCLUDED
IN THE MWRDGC FPA, IN LIEU OF CITIZEN'S UTILITIES FPA (CURRENTLY
ILLINOIS AMERICAN FPA). THIS CAUSED A 25.24. ACRE PARCEL TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE CITIZEN S UTILITIES FPA (CURRENTLY ILLINOIS
AMERICAN FPA), WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN TBE MWRDGC
PRA- DUE TO THIS DRAFTING ERROR, AN FPA AMENDMENT IS NECESSARY.
SEE EXHIBIT C'
2. Geophysical Information
Provide the following information regarding the amendment area.
a. Size: 25 . 24 Requested Amendment Area (in acres)
Attach a black-and-white map that clearly delineates the existing facility
planning area and the amendment area at a scale of 1n 2000.
b. Location: County co OK
Township(s) LEMONT
Section(s) 3 4
c. A legal description of the existing facility planning area must be included.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS UNAVAILABLE. PETITION CONSISTS OF
A legal description of the area requested must also be included. SCRIVENERS ERROR
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A ONLY.
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 10 of 23
3 Current FPA Status
Is the amendment area currently part of an existing facility planning area
No Yes x If yes, provide the name(s) of the FPA(s).
ILIINOIS AMERICAN EPA ( FORME RLY
CITIZEN S UTILITIES FPA ) SEE EXB I BIT B & EXHIBIT C
4. Population and Household Forecasts
Provide an assessment of existing and proposed population of the requested area,
and resultant waste loads and wastewater flows.
PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION FOR THE
REQUESTED AMENDMENT AREA
Current
Forecasted
Number
By Year?
Population
0
154
2015
Number of Households
0
44
2015
Residential Population Equivalent (PE)
0
154
2015
Employment
0
0
Employment Population Equivalent (PE)
0
0
Total Population Equivalent (PE)
0
154
2015
Daily Average Wastewater Flow
Current
Forecasted '
.BY Year?
Domestic
0
1.5400 gal
2015
Industrial
0
Total
0
15400 gal 2015
NOTE: The proposed amendment must not exceed the population projections for the twenty-year
planning period set forth in the currently approved facility plan or the CMAP twenty-year forecasts
for the facility planning area. CMAP may agree to adjustment within the regional forecast total.
5. Amendment Area Land Uses
a. Current Zoning of Amendment Area: RESIDENTIAL
b. Date Zoning Received: 2008
c. •Zoning Body: VILLAGE OF LEMONT
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 11 of 23
d. Development(s): Describe current and proposed land use of the amendment
area including, if available, project name, developer name, number and mix of
units for residential developments, and total acreage. For non-residential
development provide expected number of employees. Please indicate project
status (Le., planned, annexed, zoned, under construction, construction
completed, etc.). Attach additional sheets as needed.
PROJECT NAME: GLEN OAKS ESTATES
DEVELOPER NAME: GLEN OAK ESTATES LLC
RESIDENTIAL UNITS PROPOSED: 44, SINGLE FAMILY
TOTAL ACREAGE: 25.24 ACRES
PRCJECT STATUS: PLANNED, ANNEXED, ZONED PLANS WERE
UNDER REVIEW. SEF EXHIBIT D
6. Wastewater Treatment
a. Describe and map any existing wastewater sewer/interceptor and/or treatment
facility located within or adjacent to the subject amendment area. Attach
additional sheets as needed.
THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL CONNECT TO AN EXISTING 12—INCH
VILLAGE OF LEMONT SANITARY SEWER THAT IS TRIBUTARY TO THE
MWRDGC. INTERCEPTOR AT ARCHER AVENUE AND WALKER ROAD. THE
12—INCH SANITARY SEWER IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT
ON 131st STREET. SEE EXHIBIT E
b. How will wastewater services be provided to/connected to the subject
amendment area? Include map showing route of interceptors and sewers,
pump stations or gravity flow, treatment plant, etc. Attach additional sheets as
needed.
THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING 12—INCH
SANITARY SEWER ON 131st STREET. SEE EXHIBIT E
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 12 of 23
7. Alternatives - Describe wastewater service alternatives examined. (Attach
additional sheets as needed.)
•CONNECTION TO ILLINOIS AMERICAN FPA IS _UNFEASIBLE
DUE TO SYSTEM CAPACITY RESTRAINTS, IN TRE ILLINOIS
AMER ICAN FPA
8. Document the cost effectiveness of the wastewater alternatives identified in
Number 7 above. Provide a side-by-side analysis with the selected alternative
highlighted. (Describe costs for all relevant system components including, but not
limited to, sewers and interceptors, pumping stations, and treatment facilities.)
(Attach additional sheets as needed.)
CONNECTION TO ILLINOIS AMERICAN FPA IS UNFEASIBLE DUE TO
SYSTEM CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS, IN TBE ILLINOIS AMERICAN FPA .
2 Anticipated environmental impacts associated with each alternative should also be presented for water
quality (surface and groundwater), wetlands, floodplains, prime agricultural lands, fish and wildlife, and
endangered and threatened species. Options for alternative discharge locations (e.g, to receiving waters with
greater dilution rations) should also be discussed.
Revised 64-07 — Page 13 of 23
How much will provision of wastewater service to the subject amendment area
cost? THE COST IS INSIGNIFICANT. SANITARY SEWER MAIN IS.
ADJACENT TO SITE.
Treatment Facilities
Pumping: Stations
Interceptor Sewers
Collection Sewers
Land Acquisition
inspection/Construction Management
Project ManagementlDesign
Operation and Maintenance
Other
Other
Estimated Total Cost to provide service:
Uniform Annual Equivalent Cost:
Additional Comments:
10. What will be the per household user costs? PART OF VILLAGE STANDARD WATER BILL.
Connection Fee
Monthly Service Fee
Other
Other
Other
Estimated Total Per Household Monthly Cost $
Additional Comments:
'Revised 6-7-07 —Pago 14 GM
Provide the following information regarding the environmental characteristics
of the subject amendment area
a. Surface Water bodies (streams, lakes)' Map None X
b. Wetlands: Map Attached Not Applicable (none) X
(If applicable, attach map at scale of 1 inch - 2,000 feet, giving size and
location of any identified wetlands located in or irnmediately adjacent to
subject amendment area.)
c. Floodplains: Map Attached Not Applicable (none). x
(If applicable, attach map at scale of 1 inch - 2,000 feet, giving size and
location of all IDOT/DRW - Federal Emergency Management Agency
regulatory floodplains located in or immediately adjacent to subject
amendment area.
d. Other: Map Attached Not Applicable (none)
Of applicable, attach map at scale of 1 inch = 2,000 feet identifying any
aquifer, groundwater recharge area and/or state designated natural area
located on or immediately adjacent to subject amendment area.)
2. Will amendment include, require or result in modification (i.e., filling,
dredging, channelization, disposal or similar activity) of any Jake, stream,
wetland or floodplain area? No X Yes (If yes, describe.)
Revised 6-7-07 Page 15 of 23
Section E
Facility Planning Area Nonpoint Source Management
To be corriPieted for all amendment requests.
To ensure consistency with the nonpoint source management policies and objectives of the Illinois Water
Quality Management Plan, IEPA and CMAP recommend local adoption of ordinances or regulations which
provide for water quality protection which is comparable to the objectives and standards of the following
former NIPC model ordinances: 1) Model Stormwater Drainage and Detention Ordinance (as amended July
1994); 2) Model Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (1991); 3) Model Flood Pain Ordinance (1989);
and 4) Model Stream and Wetland Protection Ordinance for the Creation of a Lowland Conservancy Overlay
District (1988). The following checklist provides guidance to applicants regarding important provisions and
standards which CMAP recommends for inclusion in local ordinances. To aid in drafting of appropriate
ordinance language, recommended sections from the relevant CMAP model ordinances are listed in
parentheses.
1. Stormwater Management
a. Is the amendment area and/or facility planning area subject to a municipal
and/or county stormwater drainage and detention ordinance?
Yes X No Unknown
If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s), attach copy.
VILLAGE OF LEMONT AND MWRDGC
b. Does the applicable stormwater management ordinance:
- Include control of runoff volume, rate, and quality in the purpose
statement? (Section 100.0) Yes X No
- Promote the use of natural drainage practices (e.g., swale5, filter strips,
infiltration devices, and natural depressions over storm sewers to minimize
runoff volumes and enhance pollutant filtering? (Sections 500,0 and 711)
Yes X No
▪ Require that peak post-development discharge from events less than or
equal to the two-year, 24-hour event be limited to 0.04 •cfs per acre of
watershed? (Section 701.0) Yes No x
if no, what does it require for storms smaller than the 100-year event?
RELEASE IS RESTRICTED TO 0.15 cfs/Acre
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 16 of 23
• Require detention design standards which maximize water quality
mitigation benefits, with a preference for wet bottom and/or wetland basins
over dry basins? (Sections 600.0, 705, and 706) Yes x No
Prohibit detention in the floodway? (Section 708.2) Yes X No
• Prohibit on-stream detention, unless it provides regional stormwater
storage and is accompanied by other water quality BMPs upstream?
(Section 708.3) Yes X No
• Prohibit the direct discharge of undetained stormwater into wetlands?
(Section 709) Yes X No
Require formal maintenance contracts for new detention facilities?
(Sections 713.0 and 1100.0) Yes No x
2. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
a. Is the affected area/facility planning area subject to a municipal and/or county
soil erosion and sediment control ordinance'?
Yes X No Unknown
If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s) and attach copy.
VILLAGE OF LEMONT
b. Does the applicable soil erosion and sediment control ordinance:
- Include a comprehensive purpose statement which limits sediment
delivery, as close as practicable, to pre-disturbance levels and minimizes
effects on water quality, flooding, and nuisances? (Section 100)
Yes x No
▪ Include a comprehensive set of principles which minimize sediment
transport from the site for all storms up to the ten-year frequency event?
Yes x No
(These principles should include provisions to minimize the area disturbed
and the time of disturbance, follow natural contours, avoid sensitive areas,
require that sediment control measures be in place as part of land
development process before significant grading or disturbance is allowed,
and require the early implementation of soil stabilization measures on
Revised 6-7-07 —Page 17 of 23
disturbed. areas - Section 300).
Require ordinance applicability for any and disturbing activity in excess of
5,000 square feet, or 500 square feet if adjacent, to stream, lake, or
wetland? (Section 400)
Yes No X Other (Describe)
• Include explicit site design requirements for sediment control measures,
conveyance channels, soil stabilization, construction adjacent to water
bodies, construction entrances, etc:? (Section 503)
Yes x No
• Adopt by reference the "Illinois Urban Manual" published by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service and the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency in 1995 and the "Illinois Procedures and Standards for Urban Soil
Erosion and Sedimentation Control" published in 1988 (the Greenbook)?
( Section 504)
Yes. x No
• Require routine maintenance of all erosion and sediment control Practices?
(Section 505)
Yes x No
• Require inspection by appropriately trained personnel of construction sites
at critical points in the development process to ensure that measures are
being correctly Installed and maintained? (S.edio 506)
Yes X No.
• Provide effective enforcement mechanisms including performance bonds,
stop-work orders, and penalties, as appropriate? (Sections 405, 602, 603)
Yes X No
3. Floodplain Management
a. Is the affected area /facility planning area subject to a municipal and /or county
floodplain management ordinance?
Yes x No Unknown
If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s) and attach copy.
VILLAGE. OP LEMONT
Revised 6-7 -07 — Page 18 of 23
b. Does the applicable floodplain management ordinance:
• Include protection of hydrologic functions, water quality, aquatic habitat,
recreation, and aesthetics in the purposes for the ordinance? (Section 200)
Yes •x No
▪ Restrict modifications in the floodway to the following appropriate uses:
public flood control projects, public recreation and open space uses, water
dependent activities, and crossing roadways and bridges?
Yes x No
(The ordinance should thereby prohibit new treatment plants and pumping
facilities; detached garages, sheds, and other non-habitable structures;
parking lots and aircraft parking aprons; and roadways which run
longitudinally along a watercourse.) (Section 802.0)
• Discourage stream channel modification and require mitigation of
unavoidable adverse water quality and aquatic habitat in-ipacts? (Sections
801.1.q and 802.1.1)
Yes X No
• Discourage onstream impoundments unless public interest and
environmental mitigation criteria are met? (Section 802A .f)
Yes X No
▪ Require effective soil erosion and sediment control measures for all
disturbances in the floodway? (Section 802.1.k)
Yes x No
• Require protection of a minimum 25 foot native vegetation buffer along
the channel? (Section 802.1.p)
Yes X No
4. Stream and Wetland Protedtion
a. Is the affected area/facility planning area subject to a municipal andfor county
stream and wetland protection ordinance?
Yes No x Unknown
If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s) and attach copy.
VILLAGE OF LEMONT
Revised 6-7-07 --Page 19 of23
b. Does the applicable stream and Wetland protection ordinance:
Include a comprehensive purpose statement which addresses the
protection of hydrologic and hydraulic, water quality, habitat, aesthetic, and
social and economic values and functions of wetlands? (Section 100) Yes
No X
▪ Protect the beneficial functions of streams, lakes, and wetlands from
damaging modifications, including filling, draining, excavating, damming,
impiDundment, and vegetation removal? (Sections 6.03 and 4.00.h -
"development'")
Yes No x.
• prohibit the modification of high quality, irreplaceable wetlands, lakes, and
stream corridors?
Yes No x
• Discourage the modification of wetlands for stormwater management
purposes unless the wetland is severely degraded and nonpoint source.
BMPs are implemented on the adjacent development? (Section 6.03)
Yes No x.
• Designate a minimum 75 foot setback zone from the, edge of identified
wetlands and water bodies in which development is limited to the following
types of activities: minor improvements like walkways and signs,
maintenance of highways and utilities, and park and recreational area
development? (Section 6.03)
Yes No x
• Establish a minimum 25-foot wide protected native vegetation buffer strip
along the edge of identified wetlands and water bodies. (Section 6.08) Yes
No x
• Prohibit watercourse relocation or modification except to remedy existing
erosion problems, restore natural conditions, or to accommodate
necessary utility crossings; and require mitigation of unavoidable adverse
water quality and aquatic habitat impacts? (Sections 7.00, 7.01, and 7,02)
Yes No x
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 20 of 23
• Discourage the armoring of channels and banks unless natural vegetation
and gradual bank sloping are inadequate to prevent severe erosion?
(Section 7.03)
Yes No
• Discourage culvert crossings of streams unless necessary for allowing
access to a property? (Section 7.04)
Yes No x
• Discourage onstream impoundments unless public interest and
environmental mitigation criteria are met? (Section 7.05)
Yes No X
• Require adequate mitigation measures for approved wetland and water
body modifications, including 1.5 to 1 acreage replacement for destroyed
wetlands, maintenance and monitoring for at least 5 years, and full
restoration of natural wetland or waterbody functions?
Yes No. X
Revised 6-7-07 — Page 21 of 23
Section F
Criteria for Facility Amendments to the Areawide Water Quality
Management Plan for Northeastern Illinois
Staff review and subsequent Wastewater Committee consideration of all amendment
requests are based on the "recommended Criteria for Facilities Amendments to the
Areawide Water Quality Management Plan for Northeastern Illinois." These criteria
delineate five conditions which must be addressed as necessary prerequisites for any
amendment and an additional four conditions also of concern to CMAP.
Applicants are urged to provide any additional comments or to highlight
any portion of their amendment application that relates to these criteria.
1. Any proposed facility amendrnent must be designed to meet State of Illinois water
quality standards for the receiving waters and the appropriate discharge standards,
or must receive a variance from the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
2. The population and employment for which the proposed amendment is designed
must fall within the twenty-year forecasts for the facility planning area most recently
adopted by CMAP, or CMAP may agree to adjustments within the regional forecast
total.
3. The applicant must demonstrate that the unit of local goverrirnent granting zoning to
the project has formally accepted financial responsibility for the vvastewater treatment
system in event of system malfunction or failure. Such acceptance must be, in the
form of a resolution from the unit of local government granting zoning.
4. The proposed amendment should not reduce the effectiveness of the water quality
improvement strategy contained in the original plan, for either point or nonpoint
source control.
5.
The proposed amendment should not adversely affect the cost effectiveness of the.
Areawide Water Quality Management Plan for meeting water quality standards in the
facility planning area as a whole.
6. The proposed amendment should have the endorsement of the designated
Revised -6-7-07 Page 22 of 23
management agency for wastewater treatment and substantial support by the
municipalities within the affected facility planning area.
The proposed amendment should not adversely affect adjoining units of government.
8. The proposed amendment should be consistent with other county and regional plaits
or state policies, such as the preservation of agricultural land. Of the proposal would
require the amendment of another regional plan, CMAP will consider the wisdom of
that amendment at the same time.)
Consideration will be given to evidence of municipal or county zoning approval and
commencement of development activity prior to Areawide Water Quality
Management Plan adoption in January, 1979.
N: \nrd \Water Resources \FPA Amendment Application \Cun -ent Applicatian\wgapp CMAP 6- 7= 07.doc
Revised 6 -7 -07 -- Page 23 of
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AREA TO BE REMOVED FROM ILLINOIS AMERICAN FPA
AND TRANSFERRED TO MWRDGC FPA
THE NORTH. HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 34 TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE
THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THAT PART OF THE •SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34 NORTH, RANGE
11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH,
10.02 % CHAINS; THENCE WEST 643 CHAINS, MORE OR LESS TO AN OLD
ROAD; THENCE NORTH 17 DEGREES 30 MINUTES EAST, 10.57 CHAINS;
THENCE 3.28 CHAINS, IVIORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
EXHIBIT A
u_
z
0
w
cA Q
Z�
J_ • (�
o
O �
00
WI-
> 0
O w
W
• LL
W
m z
0
NW r• n
N Z
as
N
Existing FPA Boundaries w"
J
:s
ir 1277
i o �., / /// 1.31stSt/ // //// /
/ a /
E a; / / / / /13p, /
w a 135 h St / / i /
�d
135th St_ — _ / 4 / ArIlir
Tit �0 ' m 139th,St / / ry u' r t4raP.. a 139th St g// / // yoo� a
Z143rd St >
a 143rd St ® / a
J
S /111
C //
0
.(0'
. 151st St
` 51E�"i1�3�3 / / // I � i
r , /
St
gQ ar / 153rd S MWRDGC FPA
a
Illinois
/ 159th St
� fl Illinois-American= m I� ___.. /4//, `� Lockport Heights & ,'I� 65 a s _1�
`'I a) > /67thSt I ///
Dim E3 S r s o a tl c4>
aaa� � o /r/ IQ 171 tSt/
� m
�1/ m 175th St / /7
i v. Bruce R oca / //// /
J E (a9
m i1 3rd St / I/ 183rd St //m
It €3 ro , I -80 80 Rosalind St v a / / / /1g5thg //
a Southwest Hwy m Maple St 187th St
t.) Ma d 6 191st St
LL U-
0)
a�
E
N 0
o_
O U
= O
=
11
EXHIBIT B
117
•• --; 4: t
r--
peou Jeved
www.cookcountygov.com/cookviewer
•(r)
-.
0 10
c 0
•-. L.-
•-. %•••
....■ 0
c... 4-.
i C co
1 4...
0 Z
1:3
0 a, ....•
a) ra. us
0 0 1.... u_
c) a) 0
(7) XI Z 0
li`) CD
0 0 C)
(13 I' Cr
1
(i) E
a) I-
E
O5
..c cl)
CD
77
a) -c
:•.-, 4E)
E
cn u)
c E
1 .....,
115. ci)
0
0 1
0 ,
0
0
i 1
_... 1....
1 ,
, •
... iv
., .•, , ....., .. ,-:‘,......: ... , ..., ,
-
E 11)
ca -c
"a E2
s.. co -..-
L... ..c, 8
E z
0c
... 22
=
a) to
4■ .0
.. ""0 1■3 0 -0
' cD C C cs) vac
Cr.1 RI • a
0
al c
a) 32
CL
1 CD us c• 4- , fa. ›...
cts c
ci) cu
I L CD
.cts 0
k- ›,
- - - . • co C r z -9 ki Ts 2
<■ s....
EXHIBIT C
PLANNED USE OF AREA TO BE REMOVED FROM
ILLINOIS AMERICAN FPA AND TRANSFERRED TO MWRDGC FPA
EXHIBIT D
Olen Oak Estates
Nei
Conce tua( b6o -thoob P(av0 ?.Ci1. /ee�A an.�.
Y� 9
Lemont IUUinois
r8 Maw /on
Site Data
Gross Site Area
0107 to Perimeter RA.w. Pxpa nsimul
Net Site Area
(eflerPerimata,aaw.r paisiats)
Total Units
Density
Naturalize Open Space
)open Space emm"dors,snliars, Watford
Formalize Open S�W•;3�
INcigfixr600d Commons, Rat. W1I�jAutonntsl
Total Gross Open Space
Percentage Gross Open Space
Total Net Open Space
IAl70pm 001400000000 - 71320.)
13L14
12.5.82.
2.47
0.96 6.0 /ac.
41.06 ac.
2.54 ac.
43.49 az
35%
36.36 ac.
Percentage Net Open Space 29%
Designed By
T E 1 h A
PvoNct Data
12J15o &f. Single Family Lots (90' x 135') 93 units
to)125 s.f. Single Family Lots (75' x 135') 87 units
7i500 s.f. Single Family Lots (6o' x 125') 67 units
Total Units 247 units
Carta mlemr lot
r7LJ r_1. iJ
I r
JJ L _gLl
10,125 s.f. Lot Details
B ,th
wetfani
r
L-.
7,soo s.f. Lot Details
00 4 ..
00
eI
—'
: us�w r 6ae _>.n j vo..o sao Qao.l' , d r- -�
/ ,2e ) �'D. r - -1 r-- -Ilrua I I I ! ai
L - - - -J O ,O' ) ,ze �l) ,sz 111 I L,a1 J `0) ■ L�i:�.
1
' - - - -1 'Y L__J.L__J.L.
I am
. " I m 111. _
,a.� da0 d o•0.0.6.6�o��ldr
s..) ..ire eel It , r r "Oao s.4
... 0• +114-
*.0�0r
Communiy PLnnkrg Cmclopenu'n[amnia
Site Ltisgn landscape Archilmium
6z7 crm<s0ea
Eason. pleas 01001
T31ee1A69.016
Fat ee2M9M69
•
■
■
i
i
•
1
aeoa HJ>I1VM
Aco
OT.
av � OP
r
ce
z
a
avoid damdd
o}
z
Ow`F
X
6 aW
V
1
m
IW�N NQ�
wain
„ z MIN
O
K
a
r
r
SITE OF FPA AMENDMENT
EXHIBIT E