The URL can be used to link to this page

R-07-25 authorizing H.W. Lochner, Inc. to complete Phase 1 engineering for Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Improvements Project and Lemont-Stephen-Holmes Intersection Project.418 Main Street I Lemont, IL 60439 TO: Village Board Meeting FROM: Darshana Prakash, Finance THROUGH: George Schafer, Village Administrator SUBJECT: A Resolution authorizing H.W. Lochner, Inc. to complete Phase 1 engineering for Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Improvements Project and Lemont -Stephen -Holmes Intersection Project. DATE: February 10, 2025 SUMMARY/BACKGROUND This agenda item was discussed at the January 27th Committee of the Whole meeting. In 2023, the Board awarded two engineering contracts to Veenstra & Kimm, Inc.: (1) Main- Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Improvements Project totaling $258,150 and (2) Lemont -Stephen - Holmes Intersection Improvements Project totaling $204,300. Clay Shipley was the engineer in charge until September 2024, which is when he terminated his employment at Veenstra & Kimm, Inc. to start his own company, Shipley Design Group, PLLC. Staff recommends Shipley Design Group, PLLC continue working on this project. Also, the agreements with Veenstra & Kimm, Inc. have been terminated as per the terms of the agreement. Due to the nature of the remaining Phase I engineering, Shipley Design Group, PLLC recommends H.W. Lochner, Inc. complete both projects. The remaining balance on each of the projects for: (1) Main-Illinois-Pruxne project - $190,561. (2) Lemont -Stephen -Holmes project - $130,921 Staff recommends approving H.W. Lochner, Inc. (see attached agreements Exhibit A and B) to complete Phase 1 engineering for both projects for the remaining balance on the respective projects. ANALYSIS Consistency with Village Policy STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve H.W. Lochner to complete Phase 1 engineering. BOARD ACTION REQUESTED Approve H.W. Lochner to complete Phase 1 engineering. ATTACHMENTS Resolution_ Approving_Professional_Services_Agreement_Between_HW_Lochner_and_Vil lag IL-Pruxne_and_Lemont-Stephen-Holmes_Intersection.pdf VILLAGE OF LEMONT RESOLUTION NUMBER R-01 -25 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVVCES AGREEMENT BETWEEN H.W. LOCHNER, INC. AND THE VILLAGE OF LEMONT, ILLINOIS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR MAIN-ILLINOIS-PRUXNE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND LEMONT-STEPHEN-HOLMES INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT JOHN EGOFSKE, Village President CHARLENE M. SMOLLEN, Clerk JANELLE KITTRIDGE DAVE MAHER KEN MCCLAFFERTY KEVIN SHA UGHNESSY RICK SNIEGOWSKI RON STAPLETON Trustees Published in pamphlet form by authority of the Village President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Lemont on, 2 1 ri1 2025 P RESOLUTION NO. R-%-25 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERIVCES AGREEMENT BETWEEN H.W. LOCHNER, INC. AND THE VILLAGE OF LEMONT, ILLINOIS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR MAIN-ILLINOIS-PRUXNE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND LEMONT-STEPHEN-HOLMES INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS the Village of Lemont, Counties of Cook, Will, and DuPage, Illinois, ("the Village") is a municipality in the State of Illinois with full powers to enact Ordinances and adopt Resolutions for the benefits of the residents of the Village; and WHEREAS, the Village and H.W. Lochner, Inc. wish to enter a professional services agreement Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Improvements Project and Lemont -Stephen -Holmes Intersection Improvements Project as further outlined in the professional services agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B ("Agreements"); and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees find that it is in the best interests of the Village to authorize the Agreements attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Lemont, Counties of Cook, Will and DuPage, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals and legislative findings are found to be true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if fully set forth in their entirety. SECTION 2: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Lemont hereby approve the Agreements with H.W. Lochner, Inc. in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, subject to attorney review. SECTION 3: The Mayor and Clerk hereby authorize the Village Administrator to execute the respective Agreements with H.W. Lochner, Inc. SECTION 4: This Resolution, and its parts, are declared to be severable and any section, subsection, sentence, clause, provision, or portion of this Resolution that is declared invalid such decision shall not affect the validity of any other portion of this Resolution, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5: All Resolutions and Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF LEMONT, COUNTIES OF COOK, WILL, AND DUPAGE, ILLINOIS, ON THIS _loth_ DAY OF _February_ 2025. PRESIDENT AND VILLAGE BOARD MEMBERS: AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Janelle Kittridge Dave Maher Ken McClafferty Kevin Shaughnessy V Rick Sniegowski V Ron Stapleton ATTEST: JOHN EGOFSKE President (/4CWENE 4MILkLE�N Village Clerk O F ` G F� Q` o ItLIN'0\S cf— Lochner CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Owner: Village of Lemont, Illinois Client: Village of Lemont, Illinois ("Village") Consultant: H.W. Lochner, Inc. ("Lochner") 225 W. Washington St, 121h Floor Chicago, IL 60606 Date: January 6`h, 2025 EXHIBIT A Project Name: Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Realignment Project (Lochner Project Number 24399) Route Location: Intersection of Main Street (FAU 3587), Illinois Street (FAU 1065), and Pruxne Street (MUN 1072A) Section No. TBD Lochner and the Village of Lemont, hereafter referred to as the "Village" (collectively, the "Parties" and individually, a "Party") agree as follows: 1. Agreement. This Agreement is a contract between Lochner and the Village for Lochner to perform consulting, engineering, and/or design services on the Project. 2. Lochner. Lochner is the Village's Consultant for the services listed in this Agreement which Lochner is contracting to provide for the Project, and Lochner shall facilitate the exchange of information between or among Lochner and the Village, Lochner and other consultants retained by the Village, and Lochner and other consultants that Lochner may have retained for the Project. All communications between Lochner and the Village shall be through Lochner unless the Village authorizes otherwise. Lochner represents that it is a properly licensed engineering firm and is registered to practice its profession and to conduct business in the State of Illinois. 3. Scope of Services. Lochner shall perform the services set forth in Attachment A Scope of Work/Services, as awarded herein (the "Services"). 4. Compensation. The Village shall compensate Lochner in accordance with Attachment B Agreement Price and Schedule of Values 5. Schedule. Lochner shall perform its Services within a timeframe mutually agreed to by Lochner and the Village. Lochner shall strive to cooperate with and to coordinate its Services with the activities of all other parties to the Project, including other consultants retained by the Village. 6. Additional Services. If the Client requests Lochner to perform services that Lochner believes to be in addition to the Services specified in Section 3 of this Agreement, and for which Lochner believes it is entitled to additional time or additional compensation, before commencing with any Additional Services Lochner shall submit a written cost estimate and revised schedule in accordance with Section 15 of this Agreement. Lochner shall not commence with any Additional Services without written authorization by the Client. cf- Lochner EXHIBIT 7. Standard of Care. The standard of care applicable to Lochner's Scope of Services shall be the degree of skill and care normally employed by professionals engaged to perform services similar to the Services required herein at the same time and in the same geographic area as the performance of Services hereunder and on projects similar in size and scope to the Project. In the event a standard of care is prescribed by statute, such statutory formulation shall be the Standard of Care. 8. Payment. Lochner shall send invoices to the Client at monthly intervals. Payment will be made to Lochner for invoiced Services not more than thirty (30) days following submittal of invoice to the Client. 9. Correction of Work. Lochner shall correct any Services that fail to conform to the Standard of Care set forth in Section 7 of this Agreement at Lochner's own expense. 10. Termination. Lochner may terminate this Agreement upon five (5) days written notice if the Client breaches any term of this Agreement. The Client may terminate this Agreement upon seven (7) days written notice without cause for the Client's own convenience. If this Agreement is terminated by Lochner for the Client's breach, the Client shall be liable to Lochner for all costs and expenses that Lochner incurred prior to the termination as a result of the Client's breach. If this Agreement is terminated by the Client for its convenience, Client shall be liable to Lochner for all costs and expenses that Lochner incurred prior to the termination. 11. Insurance. Lochner will provide and maintain the following policies of insurance under the terms and conditions set forth below: 1. Professional Liability Insurance retroactive to the date of commencement of Lochner's services in relation to the Project with a per claim and aggregate limit in the amount of the greater of $1.0 million. This policy shall be maintained in effect for a period of one (1) year after completion of all Lochner's Services hereunder. 2. Commercial General Liability ("CGL") Insurance in the amount of $1.0 million per occurrence, $1.0 million aggregate limit, and $1.0 million products and completed operations aggregate limit. In addition to the coverage provided by the Commercial General Liability Insurance, if not already included in such coverage, such insurance shall also provide coverage for personal injury, bodily injury, property damage, products -completed operations (for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work) and broad form contractual liability. 3. Comprehensive Automobile Liability ("Auto") Insurance in the amount of $1.0 million per occurrence, and $1.0 million aggregate limit. In addition to the coverage provided by the Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, if not already included in such coverage, such insurance shall also provide coverage for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage arising out of owned, hired, leased and non -owned vehicles, automobiles, trucks and trailers. 4. Workmen's Compensation Insurance in the amount of the statutory maximum, if there is one, and if there is no statutory maximum, in the amount of $1.0 million and Employer's Liability Insurance of at least $1.0 million. 5. Umbrella Excess Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $3.0 million each occurrence, and $3.0 million aggregate limit. The Umbrella Excess Liability Insurance shall be written on an umbrella excess basis over, and shall follow form to, the Commercial General Liability Insurance policy, the Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance policy, and the Employer's Liability Insurance policy. The Umbrella Excess Liability Insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide defense coverage obligations. 2 cf— Lochner EXHIBIT A Lochner will include coverage for its subcontractors in its policies or obtain from each subcontractor equivalent insurance as required of Lochner hereunder. The provisions of Section 11 shall apply equally to Lochner's subcontractors as they do to Lochner. All insurance policies will be endorsed to provide that the insurance company will give the Client at least thirty (30) days written notice of cancellation or material change prior to such cancellation or modification. Prior to commencement of Lochner's Scope of Services hereunder, Lochner shall provide the Client with certificates of insurance evidencing the requirements set forth herein. 12. Indemnification. Lochner agrees to indemnify the Client and its officers, directors, members, managers, employees and assigns (the "Indemnitees") from and against liability, claims, damages, losses and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness costs, other litigation costs, judgments, settlements and economic losses) (collectively the "Losses" and individually, a "Loss") arising out of or resulting from negligent performance of any Services or duties under this Agreement by Lochner, its subcontractors, lower -subcontractors, or agents of any tier or their respective employees provided, however, that in the event of a Loss arising out of damages to persons or property, the foregoing obligation (1) shall not require Lochner to indemnify any Indemnitee for Losses other than to the extent caused by the act, omission or default of Lochner, its contractors, subcontractors, lower -subcontractors, materialmen, or agents of any tier or their respective employees, where such is prohibited by law, and (2) shall not require Lochner to indemnify any Indemnitee for Losses caused in whole or in part by any act, omission, or default of the Indemnitee, where such is prohibited by law. If the obligation to indemnify set forth in this Section is broader than that allowed by applicable law, this Section should be interpreted as providing the broadest indemnification obligation permitted and should be limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that law. Lochner shall reimburse the Client for its reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness costs and other litigation costs to enforce this Section 12 and shall survive the termination or full performance of this Agreement by either or both Lochner and/or the Client. Section 12 is to be read separately and independently of Section 11 and the additional insured obligations therein contained. 13. Waiver of Immunity. In claims against any person or entity indemnified under Section 12 by an employee of Lochner, a subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone for whose acts they may be liable (a "Claimant"), the indemnification obligation under Section 12 shall not be limited by a limitation on amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the Claimant's employer under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee benefit acts. 14. Ownership of Documents. If the Agreement requires that any of the Client's documents, drawings, plans, specifications, or other work product are, or shall become, the property of another person, Lochner shall, at the Client's request, assign all rights of ownership of any like document prepared by Lochner to the same person. 15. Changes. Client may, by written direction only, make changes, revisions, additions, or deletions (collectively called "changes") to this Agreement. Any claim by Lochner for an adjustment under this paragraph must be asserted in writing fully supported by factual documentation to the Client, within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of receipt by Lochner of the written change order from the Client, or within such extension of this period as Client, in its sole discretion, may grant in writing at Lochner's request prior to expiration of said period. Claims arising under this Agreement shall be decided in the state or federal courts located in Illinois. cf— Lochner EXHIBIT A 16. Confidentiality. Lochner acknowledges, that as part of Lochner's relationship with the Client, it will have access to information that is not publicly available ("Confidential Information"). Lochner agrees that it will maintain strict confidentiality with respect to such Confidential Information and will not, directly, or indirectly, disseminate it or use it for any purpose unrelated to Lochner's obligations under this Agreement. Lochner shall not, without the prior written consent of the Client, make any public statement, announcement or release concerning the Project or the Confidential Information to trade publications, the press, or any other individual, corporation, partnership, or entity except as may be necessary to comply with the requirements of any applicable law, governmental order or regulation. In the event Lochner believes it is required to disclose any Confidential Information in order to comply with any applicable law, governmental order or regulation, Lochner shall promptly notify the Client of same with sufficient time to allow the Client to object or otherwise take actions to prevent the disclosure of such Confidential Information. 17. Quality Control/Quality Assurance. Lochner shall perform Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QC/QA) commensurate with the Standard of Care throughout the provision of all Services by Lochner pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 18. Miscellaneous Provisions. 1. Assignment. Lochner shall not assign this Agreement or the benefits arising therefrom without the prior written consent of the Client. 2. Integration. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between Lochner and the Client and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. 3. Third Parties. There are no third -party beneficiaries to this Agreement other than as expressly indicated in Section 11 (Insurance) and Section 12 (Indemnification). 4. Invalidity. In the event any provision or part of a provision of this Agreement is found invalid by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, (i) the other provisions or parts of the provision of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding such finding, and (ii) the Agreement shall be interpreted to, as closely as possible, effectuate the purpose the original Agreement language. 5. Mutually Negotiated. The Parties acknowledge that the terms and conditions of this Agreement have been the subject of mutual negotiation, and that this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the Parties and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any Party by virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement. 6. Survival. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the provisions of this Agreement providing for limitation of or protection against liabilities between the Parties, shall survive termination of the Agreement and/or completion of the Services hereunder. 7. Limitation of Liability. Lochner's liability for any claim or breach of Standard of Care shall be limited to the amount of its Compensation as defined in Section 4. 8. Notices. Unless otherwise provided herein, all notices, requests, consents, approvals, demands and other communications to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given upon (a) the date of delivery when hand delivered to the respective Parties as set forth below, or (b) actual receipt as evidenced by proof of delivery by a national courier service or the United States Postal Service, addressed to the respective Parties at the following addresses: 10 EXHIBIT A �'- Lochner Notice to Lochner: Notice to Client Paul A. Loete, PE George J. Schafer Midwest Regional Manager Village Administrator H. W. Lochner, Inc. Village of Lemont 225 W. Washington St. 1211 Floor 418 Main Street Chicago, IL 60606 Lemont, IL 60439 9. Mutual Waiver of Consequential Damages. In no event shall either Party, their members, managers, affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, or shareholders be liable to the other Party for any special, incidental or consequential damages, director indirect, including, but not limited to, lost revenue, lost profits, financing costs, overhead, penalties, fines, liquidated damages and lost opportunities, whether incurred by a Party or by third parties to that Party may be liable, whether sounding in breach of contract, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict or statutory liability or otherwise, arising from or relating to the Services under this Agreement. 10. Electronically Produced Documents. Electronically produced documents will be submitted in data files compatible with Bentley OpenRoads Designer (00). Lochner makes no warranty as to the compatibility of the data files beyond the above specified hardware and release or version of the stated software. Because data stored on electronic media can deteriorate undetected or be modified without Lochner's knowledge, the electronic data files submitted to the Sponsor or other Agencies will have an acceptance period of thirty (30) days. If during that period the Sponsor or other Agencies find any errors or omissions in the files, Lochner will correct the errors or omissions as a part of the basic Agreement. Lochner will not be responsible for maintaining copies of the submitted electronic data files after the acceptance period. 11. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost and Construction Cost. Since Lochner has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Lochner's opinions of probable Project Cost and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of Lochner's experience and qualifications and represent its best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but Lochner cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Project or Construction Cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by Lochner. However, Lochner represents that it will use reasonable engineering care and judgment commonly exercised by an engineer in the same or similar circumstances in making and transmitting such cost estimates to the Client. 12. Force Majeure. Any delay or failure of Lochner in the performance of its required obligations hereunder shall be excused if and to the extent caused by acts of God, war, riot, strike, fire, storm, flood, windstorm, discovery or uncovering of hazardous or toxic materials or causes beyond the reasonable control of Lochner, provided that prompt written notice of such delay or suspension be given by Lochner to the Client. Upon receipt of said notice, if necessary, the time for performing shall be extended for a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of such delays and Lochner shall be reimbursed for the cost of such delays. 13. Client's Responsibilities. a. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for Lochner to enter upon public and private property as required for it to perform his/her services. 5 Cf- Lochner EXHIBIT A b. Assist in approvals and permits from all governmental entities having jurisdiction over the project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the project. c. Designate in writing a person to act as Client representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define Sponsor policies and decisions. d. Give prompt written notice to Lochner whenever Client observes or knows of any development that affects the scope or timing of Lochner's services. e. Pay publishing cost for advertisements of notices, public hearings, request for bids, and other similar items. The Sponsor shall pay for all permits and licenses that may be required by local, state or federal authorities; and shall secure the necessary land, easements and rights -of -way required for the project. f. Available information relating to environmental conditions at the property, including any permits, clearances, investigations, and remediation required for federal, state, and local agencies identified by environmental consultants for the Sponsor in currently available reports. H.W. LOCHNER, INC. Title: Vice President Date: Attachments Village of Lemont, Illinois M Title: Village Administrator Date: February 10, 2025 Attachment A- Lochner Scope of Work/Services Attachment B- Workhour Estimate & Compensation Estimate Attachment C- 289733V Project Narrative (prepared by Clay Shipley, PE) 0 (fp- Lochner Attachment A — Scope of Services EXHIBIT A Lochner understands that the Village would like to begin Phase I preliminary engineering and environmental studies for the evaluation of intersection reconstruction to realign Main Street (unmarked IDOT route), Illinois Street (unmarked IDOT route), and Pruxne Street in the Village of Lemont. Realigning Illinois Street and Pruxne Street to meet at a common location on Main Street will address outdated passive/active controls at the rail crossing and correct deficient unsafe geometric conditions. Improvements will address ongoing development and the growing need to accommodate growing bicycle and pedestrian traffic across Main Street and the Heritage Highspeed Rail Corridor. Lochner will perform the following scope of service under this agreement. Scope of work was drafted with reference to the attached project summary, 289733V Project Narrative, included as Attachment C, herewith. Tasks include assumptions on work completed by others, as well as future work to be completed by others, as noted. 1. Client, Stakeholder, and Internal Coordination Lochner acknowledges that the Village has completed several coordination interactions in support of project delivery. These past coordination events include field visits, ICC & CN meetings, and a project kickoff meeting with IDOT District 1 along with FHWA. A. IDOT & FHWA Coordination This work will include one (1) IDOT BDE/FHWA virtual coordination meeting and one (1) with IDOT District 1 virtual coordination meeting. Meetings require preparation of an agenda, exhibits, and follow-up coordination of meeting minutes. Lochner anticipates conducting these meetings on behalf of the Village. Lochner Deliverable: Meeting Agenda, Meeting Minutes Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submission of these deliverables is anticipated for the record. B. Owner & Stakeholder Coordination Work includes one (2) coordination meetings with project owner (Village of Lemont) and one (1) coordination meeting with additional project stakeholders (tbd). Coordination meetings require preparation of an agenda, exhibits, and follow-up coordination of meeting minutes. Lochner anticipates conducting these meetings on behalf of the Village. Lochner Deliverable: Meeting Agenda, Meeting Minutes Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submission of these deliverables is anticipated for the record. C. Internal Coordination Work includes two (2) internal coordination meetings with team. Meetings are anticipated to help resolve issues or clarify information regarding execution of the Project INA EXHIBIT A �'- Lochner work. No materials will be prepared prior to and following internal coordination meetings. Lochner Deliverable: N/A Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 2. Data Collection and Review All Data Collection is understood as complete through past project efforts. No scope or budget has been planned for additional collection efforts. A. Data Collection (materials assumed collected) • Land use, zoning, school districts, park districts, police districts and fire districts. • Planned and Existing Bicycle, pedestrian, and bus route accommodations. • Railroad crossing data (available online and from ICC and CN). • CN schedules and coordination information. • Metra schedules and coordination information. • FRA inventory of rail crossings (accident info, crossing data, interconnect, signal types). • Data from the Department (IDOT) around the Main Street corridor such as traffic data, soils data, geological information, right-of-way data, utility atlases, and record plans. • Studies/reports prepared by others. • Traffic data collection (directional) will be required throughout the study area utilizing MioVision cameras and processing. • Train operations data collection will be required through the study area. Manual data collection will be needed as MioVision will not perform train counts. The number of trains including type of train will be collected. This data will be used in grant/funding applications and provide needed general insight into study area existing conditions. • Existing Utility information (CADD files) • As -built information for existing roadways Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A B. Data Review, Visual Aids & Field Visits Lochner will review and organize data provided and: • Perform field site visit to the study area (1 assumed over Phase I duration). This work will include a production of a project photo log to provide additional visual aid and documentation of existing features and conditions. Photo log will be held internally for reference by the Consultant team. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 9 cf- Lochner 3. Geotechnical Studies A. Roadway Geotechnical Studies Geotechnical studies are anticipated to be completed in later design phases. Lochner Deliverable: N/A Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 4. Surveys EXHIBIT A Consultant assumes all topographic survey is complete and accurate as compiled, as of the date of this proposal. No further field survey is anticipated. A. Topographic Survey Completed survey is anticipated to include needed route, rail, boundary, utility, and hydraulic surveys including closed storm sewer features and surface conveyance topography. Full topographic survey and land boundary survey effort are required throughout the survey area. Lochner assumes handover of quality -checked Microstation CADD survey files (Bentley OpenRoads Designer (v10) for organization and use in design as reference. Lochner includes zero labor hours for coordination of missing, inaccurate, or incomplete topographic survey data. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A B. Tree Surveys (SDG) Consultant will perform planning level tree tabulation (station, offset, diameter, type, health, and structure). Mature significant individual trees or stands of mature significant trees will be identified and tabulated by species. Lochner Deliverable: Tree Information Exhibit included within the PDR Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 5. Environmental Data Collection, Inventory, and Coordination A. Existing Land Use and Environmental Justice Consultant will document existing and future land use and developments within the study area. Results will be documented in plan/exhibit format. Consultant will review environmental justice and socioeconomic impacts potentially resulting from the alternatives analyzed. Given the project location, it is expected that this will be a cursory review and result in limited documentation. The potential for full take (displacement) and partial take acquisitions will be reviewed as part of environmental justice and socio-economic considerations. Census data and demographics will be reviewed when making an assessment. Lochner Deliverable: Exhibit(s) and summary of evaluation, coordination, findings, and recommendations will be included in the Project Development Report. Submittals)/Review Cycle(s): N/A B. Environmental Survey Request W cf— Lochner EXHIBIT A Consultant assumes the Environmental Survey Request has been completed as part of past project efforts. No further action is required other than including findings within the PDR. IDOT Central Office has performed the necessary/coordination with the following agencies and provide the appropriate results for inclusion in the PDR: L Archaeological/Historic/Architectural (IHPA) Prime Farmland (USDA/NRCS, IDA) Wetlands (IDNR, USACE) Stream Crossings (IDNR, USACE) L Biological Survey (INHS, IDNR, USDOI/F&WS) I Special Waste Survey (ISGS) Lochner Deliverable: None Submittals)/Review Cycle(s): N/A C. Special Waste Special waste review and assessment within the study area (non -State right-of-way) has been completed by Environmental Protection Industries, Inc (EPI), through past project efforts (resulting in a PESA). PESA will be attached to the PDR. Lochner includes no scope or budget for coordination of PESA updates. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A D. Active Transportation Studies Existing and future facilities will be investigated as they relate to The Forge, I&M Canal trail, and multi -use path connections through the study area and along Pruxne Street to the I&M Canal trail system. Continued growth in bicycle and pedestrian traffic through the study area is expected as Lemont Downtown continues to grow and The Forge continues to build out. Consultant will study and propose network connections as applicable to the project improvements. Lochner Deliverable: Bike/Ped Existing and Proposed Network Exhibit (for inclusion within PDR) Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A E. Wetlands/Waters USFWS National Wetland Inventory indicates that no surface waters or wetlands exist within the study area. Wetland delineations and IDOT Wetland Impact Evaluation (WIE) (Task 17) will not be required. Lochner includes no scope or budget for Wetland designation or coordination of impacts. Water quality issues and Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be evaluated under Task 7, Location Drainage Study (LDS). Lochner Deliverable: None 10 EXHIBIT A �'- Lochner Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 6. Develop Purpose and Need and Feasible Alternatives A. Purpose and Need Development The project Purpose and Need will be documented in the Project Development Report (PDR) under scope of work Task 15. The project alternatives will also be developed in enough geometric detail (plan, alignment, and profile) to exhibit and evaluate the differences. Alternatives will be documented in the PDR. See scope of work Task 10 for Alternative Geometric Studies. Purpose and need language and finalize prior to incorporating within the PDR. Language is anticipated to amount to a paragraph of text, with no substantial revisions based on Client, Owner, or Agency reviews. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 7. Location Drainage Study A. Preliminary Drainage Investigation Preliminary drainage investigations and analyses will be performed for the preferred alternative. Preliminary drainage exhibits will be prepared for the Location Drainage Investigation (technical memorandum). The study document will contain all calculations, supporting documentation, and mitigation plans. Consultant will collect existing data including utility maps (available through prior efforts), as -built development plans (available through prior efforts), NRCS Soils Maps, and documentation regarding any known drainage/flooding issues. No floodways or floodplains are identified in the study area. Lochner Deliverable: Preliminary Location Drainage Investigation (technical memorandum) Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submission of this deliverable is anticipated, with one cycle of updates based on IDOT review. B. Site Visits Site investigation (one) will identify major drainage features, storm sewer systems, outfalls, and other utilities. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A C. Drainage Calculations Drainage calculations will be performed for existing conditions and preferred alternative to determine impervious areas, time of concentration, curve numbers, runoff volumes, and tributary areas. The calculations and analysis are needed to design proposed sewers, culverts, ditches, detention, and BMP's. Lochner Deliverable: Calculations attached to the Location Drainage Investigation technical memorandum Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 11 (fp- Lochner EXHIBIT A D. Detention Analysis Consultant will evaluate each drainage outlet for sensitivity and whether it is suitable for continued use. For sensitive outlets, detention will be designed in accordance with prevailing stormwater requirements. New detention facilities, expansion of existing detention facilities, oversized pipes, or ditch storage may be utilized to mitigate increased release rates due to the addition of new roadway facilities. The locations of facilities will be identified on the plans and included detail regarding control structures. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittals)/Review Cycle(s): N/A E. Existing and Proposed Drainage Exhibits Existing Drainage Exhibits and Proposed Drainage Exhibits will be prepared that will include plan detail and associated narrative. The Proposed Exhibits will be coordinated with the IDOT drainage design along Main Street. All information will be compiled into a report with calculations, documents, exhibits, agency correspondence/documentation, and a completed checklist along with a narrative of the objectives and recommendations. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 8. Noise Analysis — FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM) N/A — the preferred design is not expected to add additional lanes or realign existing roadways to the extent that noise related impacts to sensitive receptors be studied. Lochner is not including any labor hours for coordination of this item. Preparation of any exception or exclusion approval paperwork is not included within this scope. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 9. Air Quality Analysis This project is exempt from CO analysis as discussed in Article 26-14.03(a) of the BDE Manual. Lochner is not including any labor hours for coordination of this item. Preparation of any exception or exclusion approval paperwork is not included within this scope. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 10. Alternative Geometric Studies A. Alternative Development & Evaluation Concept geometry for one intersection realignment scenario was developed previously through past project efforts. Phase I studies will assess up to three total concept design alternatives. Alternative horizontal and vertical geometric studies will be evaluated for the various alternatives. The cross-section evaluation will consider 12 cf— Lochner EXHIBIT A traffic volume, lane configurations, bicycle accommodations, ADA accommodations, and right-of-way impacts. Minimizing property, access, and utility impacts will be a priority. Lochner Deliverable: Proposed Design Criteria Table (Excel and PDF); Three (3) Plan Exhibits representing the Alternatives under consideration. Comparison and Evaluation table associated with the Alternatives under consideration. Coordination of the Alternatives under consideration is assumed to be covered under scope item 1. Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submission of these deliverables is anticipated without comment and update included. B. Preferred Alternative The preferred alternative, intersection geometrics will be studied at Main Street. A full Intersection Design Study (IDS) and traffic signal warrant analysis will be required at Main Street. See scope of work under Task 13. Lochner will coordinate these studies with the improvements being proposed along Main Street under IDOT PTB 196. The west terminus of the IDOT project is believed to be just west of Wheeler Drive, which will be verified through coordination. Cross sections for further study and evaluation of the preferred alternative will be done at approximate 50' intervals and at critical locations. Locations identified as critical may be done so as a result of right-of-way proximity, existing access impacts, new access considerations, drainage impacts, utility impacts, or impact to structures. The following studies/documentation will also be undertaken for the preferred alternative: • Typical cross-section design • Plan and Profile Drawings • Cross-section detail/design • Design exception development • Barrier warrant analysis • Complete Streets • ADA ramp analysis • Preliminary construction cost estimate Lochner Deliverable(s): Signal warrant documentation; Typical Cross Section Sheet (1); Three (3) Plan and Three (3) Profile Sheets; Cross Section Sheets— assume six (6) cross section sheets with intervals as above; Design Exception forms including supporting exhibits (assume 4 design exceptions); Barrier Warrant documentation; Summary cost estimate table. Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submission of these deliverables, to IDOT only, are anticipated without comment and update included. Exclusion: Lochner will not make technical review submittals to the Railroad stakeholders and therefore will not be seeking formal Railroad approval on the preliminary design for the subject improvements. Formal Railroad technical approvals will be sought in the next phase of design. 13 cf— Lochner 11. Crash Analysis EXHIBIT A A. Site Review and Documentation Utilizing the most recent crash information, Consultant will analyze crash frequency, severity, and patterns for roadways in the project area. Consultant will review crash reports as available to identify contributing factors in the project study area. Crash data for the most recent five years will be requested from IDOT, reviewed, and tabulated. A crash analysis summary will be completed and included in the PDR. Consultant will coordinate with ICC and Client in documenting safety issues at the rail crossing and implement important data that can be documented outside of the data provided by IDOT. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 12. Work Zone Transportation Management Plan A. Development & Documentation Consultant will develop the concept for traffic maintenance and Lochner will support with exhibit needs. Traffic Management Plan (TMP) will be required for impacts to Pruxne Street, Main Street (FAU 3587) and Illinois Street (FAU 1065), which are non -significant routes. It will be important to coordinate design modifications and construction impacts with the improvements being proposed along Main Street under IDOT PTB 196, Item 6. It is expected that a basic Traffic Control Plan (TCP) will be prepared and accompany the TMP technical memorandum. The technical memorandum will be submitted and reviewed by IDOT District 1 Bureau of Traffic for "conceptual concurrence". Consultant does not anticipate, nor include scope and budget for IDOT detour committee coordination. Lochner Deliverable: TMP memorandum and exhibits Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submission of this deliverable is anticipated, with one cycle of updates based on IDOT review. 13. Intersection Design Study A. IDS Development IDS work will be required in accordance with IDOT District 1 requirements at the realigned intersection, for the preferred alternative. The following IDS activities will be required: Existing traffic counts via MioVision (see Task 2). Coordination with CMAP for 2050 traffic projections. o Lochner assumes CMAP will provide calibrated Existing and 2050 design year AADT values o Lochner will convert these AADT values to Design Hourly Volumes (DHVs) Capacity analysis consisting of Synchro/HCS modeling for existing AM+PM, projected AM+PM (no improvements), and projected AM+PM (with improvements) (P- Lochner EXHIBIT A • Capacity analysis report. • Traffic signal warrant studies (under Scope Item 10) • Prepare IDS plan(s). • Coordinate IDS work with the improvements being proposed along Main Street under IDOT PT13196 (under Scope Item 1) Lochner Deliverable: Intersection Design Study Plans (one intersection Alternative); Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submittal assumed with one update from comments for each deliverable. 14. Public Involvement A. Public Meeting It is expected that one public informational meeting will be required. Initial coordination with IDOT and FHWA will provide final determination. Consultant to prepare materials for the meeting (assumed to be 3-hour open house), and consultant will facilitate the meeting, including providing advance notification, advertisements, and publicity. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittals)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 15. Project Development Report A. Report Development Consultant will prepare a PDR in accordance with the Section 22-2.11 of the BLR Manual using the appropriate BLR 22210 formwork. The PDR is prepared to ensure environmental issues and design features are consistent with Federal, State, and local goals and objectives. All research, studies, findings, design variances, public coordination, and commitments developed during Phase I Engineering activities will be identified and discussed. The PDR will contain a preliminary cost estimate for the proposed improvements. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 16. Bridges/Structures Not applicable for this project. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 17. Wetland Impact Evaluation Form/Process (WIE) Not applicable for this project. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 15 ,:?- Lochner 18. Section 4(f) and 6(f) Evaluation and Report EXHIBIT A Not applicable for this project. Lochner has not included scope and budget for evaluation/determination of impacts to 4(f) or 6(f) properties, including access to stated property types. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 19. Section 106 Evaluation Not applicable for this project. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 20. ICC and Railroad Coordination A. Coordination Activities Coordination required with ICC and CN will be a part of this project. Prior coordination included one rail corridor field review with Village officials and representatives from ICC. Assume meetings will be via video conference. Lochner will prepare materials for ICC meetings, attend meetings as a participant, and prepare meeting minutes documenting each meeting. Four meetings assumed in total. Scope does not include preparation and filing of a formal ICC petition, nor activities related to a formal hearing in this regard. Lochner Deliverable: Meeting materials for each ICC or CN meeting as well as meeting minutes. An Exhibit representing the existing grade crossing location, including identification of current warning and protective devices is necessary for coordination. Submittals)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submittal without update from review comments assumed. 21. Lighting Studies A. Studies and Concept Development Lochner will perform initial planning level studies in the study area for lighting. The following items define the general scope of this task: • Lighting Warrant Studies • Lighting Layout (Preliminary Light Standard Spacing) • Preliminary Illumination/Photometric Calculations, Adjust Spacing Lochner Deliverable: Lighting Warrant documentation, Lighting plan exhibit, Lighting Calculations Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): One electronic submission of these deliverables, to IDOT only, are anticipated without comment and update included. 22. Administration and Management 16 EXHIBIT A cf- Lochner A. Administration and Management Lochner will prepare and submit progress reports and invoices to VK on a monthly basis. The progress reports will summarize work performed during the past month, anticipated activities for the upcoming month, the identification of open/critical issues, and the overall status of the project with regard to schedule and budget. Invoices will be prepared per IDOT standard format with appropriate support documentation. Lochner Deliverable: Monthly Invoices with progress reports Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 23. Quality Assurance / Quality Control A. QA/QC Lochner QA/QC tasks include thorough review and documentation of milestone deliverables prior to formal submittal to the Client, IDOT, and other agencies. Lochner Deliverable: None Submittal(s)/Review Cycle(s): N/A 24. Consulting Advisory & Coordination Services - Shipley Design Group, PLLC Consultant has included an allowance ($7,500) for Consulting Advisory & Coordination Services through the Shipley Design Group, PLLC (SDG). SDG may be selectively engaged to perform coordination and advisory services relative to the core scope of work put forth in this proposal. These services will be charged at a rate of $168/hour and will not exceed a total billing fee of $7,500. Engagement of the aforementioned services will be at the discretion of Lochner. 25. EXCLUSIONS The following items are not included in Lochner's scope of services: A. Data Collection or Research of existing conditions B. Special waste studies (PSI) C. Plats and legal descriptions for land acquisition D. Pre -Final or Final Plans E. Field Verification of Utilities F. Utility Conflict Analysis or Coordination G. Topographic Survey H. Noise Analysis I. Air Quality Analysis J. Landscape studies/plans K. Grant Application preparation and financial implementation strategy/planning L. Structural Analysis or Design M. Environmental Survey Request preparation or coordination N. Section 4(f) and 6(f) analysis (including access changes) O. Section 106 studies or reporti P. Pavement design, I -last checklists V2.02, and tech memo(s) Q. Railroad Technical Submittals/Approval (technical materials can be provided to Railroad stakeholders as information only) 17 Cf- Lochner EXHIBIT A R. Formal ICC Petition/Permit Filing, nor related activities in support of this process ` ., (P- Lochner EXHIBIT A Attachment B — Workhour & Compensation Estimate (see following page) Lochner will invoice Client on a Time and Materials basis in accordance with the schedule of values included below. Lochner will not exceed our estimated fee of $190,475.00 without prior written approval from the Client. 19 EXHIBIT A 0 i H L m: X W I y a I � W x LL O U u d E Z M O N a E O �r U N � c O w E a E z a� R Z -' w Y m E NC O � Y E C o c O cn — m N E L O ,= m F = c C c N U U o V r o L Y m ° ' N c O o 0 d = 0 = z w o � o LO v o co w N WSW � U QLQL LL W } O 2 o � X LU W > J Oa O U W J m � Q Q H W Z O F- W a a J v O N W O � JNC4 N N N N a O/ N N NN U'^ LL �- a N ZZ CM �"� OD N V / W a W 0 F- H W U Ln O Z W 1-- 9 W N H Z O U 0 0 �r- cc M O 00 M C W o O U rn t O O d M Lo cm O O fn LO LO °r o 0 0 N N r � i M � LL y O Z NO o ~ Q o Q �U LU � W v LO LO O J m 0 M CR a. Attachment B EXHIBIT A Local Public Agency County Section Number Villaae of Lemont Cook jTBD Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number H.W. Lochner, Inc PAYROLL RATES EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE MAXIMUM PAYROLL RATE 86.00 ESCALATION FACTORI 1.83% CLASSIFICATION MOT PAYROLL RATES ON FILE CALCULATED RATE Principal $86.00 $86.00 Project Manager III $86.00 $86.00 Project Manager II $80.24 $81.71 Project Manager 1 $66.74 $67.96 Engineer Associate 1 $35.75 $36.41 Engineer 1 $47.08 $47.94 Engineer II $58.68 $59.76 Engineer IV $83.74 $85.28 Project Accounting Specialist $41.51 $42.27 CADD Manager $73.50 $74.85 Planning Manager $55.29 $56.30 Planner 1 $35.58 $36.23 Printed 1/6/2025 2:41 PM BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) RATES 21 Attachment B EXHIBIT A Local Public Agency County Section Number Village of Lemont Cook TBD Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number H.W. Lochner, Inc Total SUBCONSULTANTS EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET Contribution to Prime NAME Direct Labor Total I Consultant 0.00 0.00 NOTE: Only subconsultants who fill out a cost estimate that splits out direct labor may be listed on this sheet. Printed 1/6/2025 2:41 PM BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) SUBS 22 Local Public Agency Attachment B Count Speil9n NMU+bIT n Village of Lemont Cook TVA-I1T61�PC Consultant / Subconsultant Name Job Number H.W. Lochner, Inc DIRECT COSTS WORKSHEET List ALL direct costs required for this project. Those not listed on the form will not be eligible for reimbursement by the LPA on this project. EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET ITEM ALLOWABLE QUANTITY CONTRACT RATE TOTAL Lodging (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD) Actual Cost (Up to stale rate maximum $0.00 Lodging Taxes and Fees (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Actual Cost $0.00 Air Fare Coach rate, actual cost, requires minimum two weeks' notice, with prior IDOT approval $0.00 Vehicle Mileage (per GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD Up to state rate maximum 200 $0.67 $134.00 Vehicle Owned or Leased $32.50/half day (4 hours or less) or $65/full day 4 $65.00 $260.00 Vehicle Rental Actual Cost (Up to $55/day) $0.00 Tolls Actual Cost 1 $50.00 $50.00 Parking Actual Cost $0.00 Overtime Premium portion (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Shift Differential Actual Cost (Based on firm's policy) $0.00 Overnight Delivery/Postage/Courier Service Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $100.00 $100.00 Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (In-house) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Copies of Deliverables/Mylars (Outside) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Project Specific Insurance Actual Cost $0.00 Monuments (Permanent) Actual Cost $0.00 Photo Processing Actual Cost $0.00 2-Way Radio (Survey or Phase III Only) Actual Cost $0.00 Telephone Usage (Traffic System Monitoring Only) Actual Cost $0.00 CADD Actual Cost (Max $15/hour) $0.00 Web Site Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $200.00 $200.00 Advertisements Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $750.00 $750.00 Public Meeting Facility Rental Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $750.00 $750.00 Public Meeting Exhibits/Renderings & Equipment Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Recording Fees Actual Cost $0.00 Transcriptions (specific to project) Actual Cost $0.00 Courthouse Fees Actual Cost $0.00 Storm Sewer Cleaning and Televising Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Traffic Control and Protection Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Aerial Photography and Mapping Actual Cost (Requires 2.3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Ulliity Exploratory Trenching Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Testing of Soil Samples Actual Cost $0.00 Lab Services Actual Cost (Provide breakdown of each cost) $0.00 Equipment and/or Specialized Equipment Rental Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Various as needed Actual Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS: $3,244.00 Printed 1/6/2025 2:41 PM BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09123) DIRECT COSTS IT] O U 0 E m Z i+ C O c.> cn C c� O U O L U O J i so W W Cl) Y >0 U) U W U LLJ Lu W U 2 > N 0� YW �co 0 Q LLI Q U) Z NO LL W 0 U OQ U� W Cn 0 U _m X W O 0 00 CC r LLB F- Q 0 LU W 0 EXHIBIT A �U) N w � W o f- 00 U 0 0 0 0 0 o -lo�_ a o 0 0 0 0 o 0 LO CO O I- m d7 � CO (O � M 0) LO V �' O O O w Q LO O O N LO M I� d' — M 00 M LO CO O O (T f O M O CD N CD r— N N E CO d' I-- N"t N N CO C) w0 N 0 o � CO CO MO _ CO N W CO N M I� V' d' O O O (D ti f LO CO 00 Ln M f �— T M t` M N O N N O N I� O O M Cfl N M c0 M cc C)h Ln O eP I J CO-- U) — M M V I— m V V m co M Ih Efl V' N O d7 O M TT M C�i co O oL O o w 0: w U — 2 > 0 w w O h M N CO 00 OO I� Ln C:) C:)N Ln O LO(9 N N V CO O d' Cl) C)N �t N w r N LO .— Cfl I` LO 00 O LO LO 0) w LL co �t M 0) 0 w x LL N CO CO O It dt CO O CO CO M CO N N co co r oty h N O O N 00 00 N (0 M O N O't N d' V � M 00 (` CO V V w 00 CO N c0 N N d' r- Ln I� N N N O O Z w W m � w W >z Oof w N O) N N O 0) 00 N C) I-- co O V N N N co fit' CD I` CO Cfl LO N LO Ln I- �t r— r— N J N co O O M V Lo CO N M O O M (O V CO I-- N N N_ O LO O IY a a M N N N 00 CO 00 N M (O CO d' V O co M (` co U) co e— Cl) I� N M Cl) m CO M N d' N N O x LL U) 0 O O Ef3 N � c 0 L) �o F U 3 w o 0 � c A C II � °o C N C w ° a)U J OL C o m := J N p 'O (n _@ a� O Q@ Z) CL O J Y Ir N V) C O @� c� Z) U Q ° c> 0)E O E@° U n U y O a�i E C C c: corOj 'O C� .(n C@ N O a) p J C m >. '@ O> O N 'C_- N@❑ N@ > C N N@ ❑ y O L) j, @ u@i O M a N 'O 'E >, O @ is 0 U t E Q O m@ Cc C p � �a <n U❑�cnw��ac�� L_,aCi Cn co LO 't o N a 0 U W Q r CU W N� 6L a NJN LJ� w W E 743 Me T-i H W W W LU Y U) U W U vJ LU _U LL W F-- Z Q J VJ Z O LL O F- CQ G W O F- m x W 00 M = N HIS _ � o 0 0 o _ O 0 o o 0 0 C, �p U N cN N Lo A ❑ i O C 00 M M O W = M a o 0 Q o (0 cc 61> y T o o > is e O cu d O y o y L 0 O v O N 2 v rn o o cn o r a r 00 0 d O O y p O O O 2 O) c) O NC) c c 0 V co co 47 > > o L 0. M M M O 0 co co M � i o ❑ O V V N x m N r c M Loa N M r- co a a o c o 0 e lC M M co M p o d O o 0 o co O co co coo O U i 0 O M 2 O) V c0 W cq to O ? > V N 6J O r (O V o N o o p o LoLU M Q d M N m M (6 O M M O � -i ao O 00 Oco 0 0 O 0 o O O O C. O O O O O O O O o O O O f� J O O O o O d' I� M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O Q F- = M O M O F JN O O CO V c0 CO f- Lo O M jF O O o V m f- N N W M N a o Lo M x w N c0 M V Lo w d' r- 2 Z O a _ W � m u- m m coa o c F- QN m ca m Q-_ OF 4. Q ou 2 2E 2 `m Q 2 w J d N N N .0 C C C N O o m 61 p ❑ Q C @ C @ a` w w w w a na w N (� 0)> O Q N O N LO LO O J CD G N LO N 0 N Qo '.l LO N m (i 0 (D 'Q J C s (L 0 C) R (,) Q O J > U N C L U 0 J 1■ W a F U W a LL O 2 W CD Q W E MI LL O NI F- LU W U) LLI LU Y O U LU U U) W _U Lu z J D z O U L. O w CQC 'G vJ w U) O U m 2 X W ,av O CO N p �IH fn Q N � c y N o 0 0 0 0 e � O O CD r p Cj 00 M CD U N ` ` O G1 O Ct 00 m O co 67 C = 16 a al M � CT 0 N Q 6 10 d co N f9 U C o 0 0 G1 2 co 00 p 6 d LO co co U w ` O O IN N N CO co ~ 2 O a m m Q � 0 v y � N N fA .y T @ 0 0 0 C Q c O O p s a i ri y N @ U L O O M N M S a c z , ?, Q Ln CO 06 LO co E 0 y O CO p > fn a °o v N rn LO °p co E y y O y Q ON o VC\j 00 O O N 2 V O Q O) � N co v 0 0 0 0 e N N o M m M o O p d N M M C O N O U` O 3 0 V co V co V <t O J 2 a n N O S Q °' m Lo N Z a o 0 0 @ c N o p O p v a o 0 y O O. 0 n 7 � a 0 0 v v o co 2 JN CDO CO FO O OT V CT r` N N CO M N Q 0 � co CO M co coCO co M V Ln 00 V 2 Vl Z @ O ID U) O U LL O) O m O C 7 c @ C F O Q � @ @ @ N o @ @ a.F- -ia2 2 Q U C o o o 61 07 0 Q @ @ a- a d a w w w w w 7 d' LO LO O J m I G a_ N LO N O N a C .l O V U C N 2 L 0 J LE LU r U W a J M 0 LU LU V NQN LU V LL O Cl) LU LU co EN U ` C o O r C p O 0 U a M M Q T `` O O O m � N N C'1 x a m N N O 00 mLO O M �j Q LO C cc c c O N 0 0 0 v r V N Q 0 0 O r O QO 0 O m o ri N 2 C O a N o m O Q 00 U Ul a M M � cCD a C o m O CD O CD c '� lV d a CD o c0 rn c rn O o v N o J 2 a 07 M M N 6 N ti r N a V 0i d o6 a M O O m m 0 0 0 0 0 c M � M O C O O O Uv a co (.0M M U o O W N 2 O N LO V O M O N y O) > Q V M l!i O N O. o o 0 0 0 j o co l0 CD CDO `- a)y O� f0 aco 7 co co co O U N O a 00 M .0 2 a cm O� r- O Q O N m c N E N ti d 0N o 0 > 0 Mo L C o a. co v 't U a i O 0 v cmo x (n J W O CD d' M M� N l0 Co. O m N O O I� O V 0) � N Co. Q M V r LO m w W 00 CO O M 7 LO 2 Z N 0 _ 0- 0 L) ——— Q LL 0 N O N U O C 7 d m N C m m M a N @ N N Q —— U J fl U U U ro (SDa)� U C C C G O Q C C C O O O m m 0) 01 0 Q �p @ a n 0- a_W W W W a` U d d � co N 0 m AR Q 0 Ln Ln O J 0] rl- N G N LO N O N C v cf— Lochner EXHIBIT A Attachment C — 289733V Project Summary — Main Street at Illinois Street and Talcott Avenue Rail Crossing (Completed by Clay Shipley, PE, 2024) m Attachment C EXHIBIT A Rail Safety Improvement Village of Lemont ipm, Project Summary - Page I 1 Inventory No: 289733V Municipality: Village of Lemont Project Title: Rail Crossing and Roadway Intersection Safety Improvements Main Street at Illinois Street Intersection and Talcott Avenue Rail Crossing This project proposes intersection reconstruction to realign Main Street (FAU 3587), Illinois Street (FAU 1065), and Talcott Avenue to safely accommodate all modes of transportation across existing highspeed rail lines. Realigning Illinois Street and Talcott Avenue to meet at a co►nmon location on Main Street will address outdated passive/active controls at the rail crossing and correct deficient unsafe geometric conditions. Improvements will address ongoing development and the need to accommodate growing bicycle and pedestrian traffic across Main Street and the Heritage Highspeed Rail Corridor. Following a rail corridor field review with ICC and FRA, concept geometry for an intersection realignment scenario was developed. The concept was shared with the ICC as part of a proposed Lemont comprehensive Rail Crossing Improvement Program in October 2022. Refer to Exhibit A for an Aerial Map of the Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program. The ICC replied to the proposed program in November 2022 by including this improvement in the Fiscal Year 2024 to 2028, Crossing Safety Improvement Program (CSIP). Refer to Exhibit B for the ICC Funding Letter. The Village has approved and is funding most of Phase I engineering. Coordination with Southwest Conference took place in July 2023 and the IDOT Phase I kickoff meeting was held in August 2023. Route and boundary surveys, environmental submittals, and alternative reviews have since been undertaken. Federal funding has been secured for future phases of this project and the Village is prepared to support additional preliminary engineering required to meet federal guidelines and achieve Phase I engineering design approval through IDOT and FHWA. The following is a summary of needed improvements and associated discussion as documented in a formal meeting with ICC and CN in June 2023. See Exhibit C for meeting notes and attendees. b Refer to Exhibit D, Intersection Realignment Concept - note that detail provided in Exhibit C is conceptual and meant for discussion only. b The proposed work will involve realigning Illinois Street and Talcott Avenue to meet at a common location on Main Street. This improvement will address outdated passive/active controls at the rail crossing and correct deficient unsafe geometric conditions. The Forge development (https:,(/theforgelive.com/) continues to grow and attract more events. Improvements will address ongoing development and the need to accommodate increasing bicycle and pedestrian traffic across Main Street and the Heritage Highspeed Rail Corridor. b Improvements will include pavement reconstruction, concrete curb and gutter, closed drainage improvements, multi -use path accommodations, commercial access improvements, railroad crossing signals and warning devices, roadway intersection traffic signals, lighting, landscaping, striping, and signing. Proposed improvements will require right-of-way acquisition. The northbound left turn (north of the rail crossing) to Talcott Avenue is a concern given that only minor queuing would impact the rail crossing. A second concept was added to Exhibit C that was not presented at the meeting, which would eliminate the concern. However, this is only conceptual and has not been presented to stakeholders under a formal preliminary engineering process. IIS Attachment C EXHIBIT A Rail Safety Improvement Village of Lemont iTV4 Project Summary - Page 12 b A "T" intersection at Pruxne Street and Talcott Avenue may also be a concept for further study. b A dedicated southbound right turn lane on Talcott Avenue may present issues with rail crossing pre -signaling and right turn overlap. b A proposed multi -use path across the tracks will be a challenge. It was noted that the multi -use path may be best located on the west side of the realigned intersection and designed to cross in the most efficient manner possible. Off roadway alignment design of a multi -use path that crosses the tracks is not preferred. b There are other important design considerations that must be coordinated with ICC and CN as preliminary engineering enters alternatives review. IDOT will also be important to the review and design given their jurisdiction and ongoing design of improvements to the east on Main Street. b The Village owns much of the right-of-way outside of existing public ways and around the concept shown in Exhibit C. However, some land acquisition will be required. Attached as Exhibit E is the IDOT Phase I Kickoff Meeting conference report. Attached as Exhibit F are Environmental Survey Request (ESR) exhibits submitted to IDOT. Attached as Exhibit G is engineer's opinion of costs. NOTE: Main Street (FAU 3587) is a "minor arterial" under Village jurisdiction west of Illinois Street and under IDOT jurisdiction east of Illinois Street. Illinois Street (FAU 1065) is a "minor arterial" under IDOT jurisdiction. Attachments: Exhibit A ................. Aerial Map, Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program b Exhibit B ................. ICC Funding Letter b Exhibit C.................. ICC and CN Meeting Notes (notes only, no exhibits) Exhibit D................. Intersection Realignment Concept 1* Exhibit E.................. IDOT Phase I Kickoff Meeting Conference Report (notes only, no exhibits) * Exhibit F.................. Environmental Survey Request (ESR) Exhibits * Exhibit G ................. Engineer's Opinion of Costs 30 Exhibit A Aerial Map, Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program Exhibit B ICC Funding Letter Attachment C STATE OF ILLINOIS EXHIBIT A ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION BUREAU / RAIL SAFETY SECTION Brian Vercruysse, P.E. Rail Safety Program Administrator November 23, 2022 George Schafer Village Administrator 418 Main Street Lemont, IL 60439 Phone: (630) 257-1590 Email: schafer .lemont.il.us Dear Mr Schaffer: Thank you very much for meeting this summer to highlight safety concerns at the highway -rail crossings in the Village of Lemont. Thank you also for the summary provided on September 30, 2022. This office will include the following crossings in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2024 -2028, Crossing Safety Improvement Program, for approval of the Commission in March 2023. This would provide funding assistance from the Grade Crossing Protection Fund. Estimate/ Web Link DOT # Railroad (CN) Street Placeholder Scope to Review ICC TALCOTT Intersection Realignment & Inventory 289733V Illinois Central Railroad AVE $2,000,000 Warning Device / Signal ICC Inventory 289734C Illinois Central Railroad HOLMES ST $350,000 TBD ICC STEPHEN Add ped devices, review Inventory 289735J Illinois Central Railroad ST $500,000 options for warning devices. ICC Add ped gates and review Inventory 289736R Illinois Central Railroad LEMONT ST $1,000,000 four quadrant gates. Commission Staff will coordinate a meeting with the CN Railroad and Village in early 2023 to discuss scope of work, estimates, and stipulated agreements. We can also discuss operations at the Metra Station and any other updates in relation to Commission Docket T18-0111 and Walker Road. If you have any questions, please contact Chris Murauski at Christopher. Murauski(cbill inois.gov or (630) 947-6283, or me at (312) 636-7760. Cc: Nick Burwell, CN Clay Shipley — Veenstra & Kimm Inc. Very truly yours, zy Brian Vercruysse, P.E. Rail Safety Program Administrator 34 Exhibit C ICC and CN Meeting Notes, Rail Crossing Improvement Program Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program i7u Agenda/Attendees Meeting Summary Page 1 Program Meeting #1 — June 5, 2023—10:OOam Rail Crossing Improvement Program — notes added in "blue" text to reflect minutes of the meeting. Intro — see Page 6 for attendees. Rail Crossing Improvement Program Refer to [exhibit-1] and [exhibit-1A]. • Attendees reviewed and discussed program components: o (5) public, (2) private, (1) pedestrian, (1) new public. o (1) new public would replace the (2) private. o Diagnostic field reviews completed. o ICC funding in FY24-28 CSIP. See attachment [letter]. ICC has programmed significant funding. -�, Walker Road Extension Project E1 active and alts are being updated: o Refer to [exhibit-2]. o The importance of the Walker Road extension project and the elimination of private crossings at Boyer Street and McGuire Parkway were discussed. o The Village is engaged in and funding Phase I engineering (Section No. 20-00055-00-RR) for improvements that will extend Walker Road (CH W13) from Main Street (FAU 3587) north of the Illinois Central Railroad. This scope includes ICC, CN, IDOT Rail, Metra, and Township collaboration to eliminate two deadly private crossings and provide safe access to existing and proposed commercial development including The Forge (hUps://theforgelive.com/). o Phase I engineering has been slowed by new design considerations and new concepts for the extension of Walker Road. Surveys were completed, IDOT environmental reviews were underway, and multiple concepts were studied. The Forge still has a second phase of development planned in the area adjacent to where Walker Road may be extended. The Village continues to coordinate with The Forge and plan the continuation of preliminary engineering. o Status of the annexation of Boyer Road and adjacent property was discussed. Please note that ICC requested status of the annexation process for roadways under jurisdiction of Lemont Township. The Village did not have an update or any new developments to provide. There was also no update to provide regarding land acquisition needs across other properties impacted by the proposed improvement alternatives. Additionally, there was no timeline provided on this matter. However, the Village understands that this is a major first step and is working towards coordination of remaining land needs and associated annexation as it relates to the extension of Walker Road, or some other improvement not yet identified that affects change at the private rail crossings. The Village will provide an improvement approach and timeline as soon as possible. o It was noted that four quadrant gates may not be needed for the current concepts being considered. Note that a new at -grade crossing would serve the two adjacent commercial properties and The Forge would use the access as they do today for deliveries and personnel only. It would not be an access for general public use and pedestrian/bike traffic would be prohibited. Walker Road extension and the new at -grade crossing would be under the jurisdiction of the Village. Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program Agenda/Attendees Meeting Summary Page 2 o It was noted that IDOT Bureau of Rail be contacted and included in future correspondence and key meetings. The Village team made contact in the past with John Oimoen (Deputy Director) as well as Elliot Ramos, Scott Speegle, and Todd Popish. Contacts at Metra were also made that included Chris Krakar (Chief Engineering Officer) and Tim Pitzen. Contacts will be refreshed and coordination with IDOT Bureau of Rail and Metra will continue. Significant federal funding is proposed for this improvement: o Village funding E1. o STU funding E2 = $520,000. o STU funding CON = $1,500,000. o ICC funding a footnote in FY24-28 CSIP. Regarding this footnote, there is no longer state funding identified for the Walker Road extension project. Rebuild Illinois (RBI) funding was originally allocated for a proposed grade separation at Walker Road. Because the Village is no longer seeking a grade separation, the RBI funding has been reallocated to other projects in Illinois. Alternatively, the four public at -grade crossings within the Downtown Lemont area have been included in the Crossing Safety Improvement Program for funding assistance from the Grade Crossing Protection Fund. See attached November 23, 2022 [letter]. -;> ICC docket T18-0111 — motion to withdraw submitted. The motion to withdraw has reached CN and is being reviewed. There were no issues noted with the motion at the date of this meeting. -;5 Main-Illinois-Pruxne/Talcott Intersection realignment and new warning/pedestrian devices, signals. ICC and CN provided the following feedback: o Refer to [exhibit-3] — note that detail provided in [exhibit-3] is conceptual and meant for discussion only. o The proposed work will involve realigning Illinois Street and Pruxne Street to meet at a common location on Main Street. This improvement will address outdated passive/active controls at the rail crossing and correct deficient unsafe geometric conditions. The Forge development (https://theforgelive.com/) continues to grow and attract more events. Improvements will address ongoing development and the need to accommodate increasing bicycle and pedestrian traffic across Main Street and the Heritage Highspeed Rail Corridor. o Improvements will include pavement reconstruction, concrete curb and gutter, closed drainage improvements, multi -use path accommodations, commercial access improvements, railroad crossing signals and warning devices, roadway intersection traffic signals, lighting, landscaping, striping, and signing. Proposed improvements will require right-of-way acquisition. o The northbound left turn (north of the rail crossing) to Talcott Avenue is a concern given that only minor queuing would impact the rail crossing. A second concept was added to [exhibit-3] that was not presented at the meeting, which would eliminate the concern. However, this is only conceptual and has not been presented to stakeholders under a formal preliminary engineering process. o A "T' intersection at Pruxne Street and Talcott Avenue may also be a concept for further study. o A dedicated southbound right turn lane on Pruxne Street may present issues with rail crossing pre - signaling and right turn overlap. o A proposed multi -use path across the tracks will be a challenge. It was noted that the multi -use path may be best located on the west side of the realigned intersection and designed to cross in the most efficient manner possible. Off roadway alignment design of a multi -use path that crosses the tracks is not preferred. 37 Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program ik?V4 Agenda/Attendees Meeting Summary Page 3 o There are other important design considerations that must be coordinated with ICC and CN as preliminary engineering enters alternatives review. IDOT will also be important to the review and design given their jurisdiction and ongoing design of improvements to the east on Main Street. o The Village owns much of the right-of-way outside of existing public ways and around the concept shown in [exhibit-3]. However, some land acquisition will be required. o It was confirmed that CN is scheduling crossing/platform maintenance improvements for later this year. A meeting was held with CN on June 20, 2023 at Village Public Works. CN will schedule work to begin near the end of October to avoid The Forge and Village events. Separate informal meeting notes were released for this meeting. PPI and request for E1 kickoff with IDOT: o Documentation has been forwarded to IDOT for initiation of this project (Phase I engineering study). o The date of the IDOT Phase I kickoff meeting will be provided as soon as possible. Significant federal and ICC funding is proposed for this improvement: o Refer to [exhibit-4]. Note that the sources and uses of funds is preliminary and subject to change as the scope of improvements develops. o Village funding E1. o ICC support = $2,000,000 — See attached November 23, 2022 [letter]. This funding is an estimate/ placeholder and is subject to change based on further review and scope of future design. o CRISI CPR funding = $1,500,000 -�, Holmes Street Discuss options — several improvement options were discussed: o The roadway profile across the tracks is steep and a challenge to navigate. Two quadrant gates with post - mounted signals exist at the rail crossing with 4-way stop control at the adjacent Main Street intersection. o Converting the crossing to pedestrian/bike access only was discussed. Note that the Village is constructing a new bridge across the I&M Canal just east of Holmes Street. o Closing the crossing was also discussed. ICC noted that closing the crossing may create a trespassing issue. Limitations exist for crossing closures and further review is required for vehicular roadway reduction to a pedestrian path. Fencing and trespass mitigation was also discussed as additional measures that could be implemented through the corridor. o The Village intends to discuss the options internally and respond a soon as possible. o It was confirmed that CN is scheduling crossing/platform maintenance improvements for later this year. A meeting was held with CN on June 20, 2023 at Village Public Works. CN will schedule work to begin near the end of October to avoid The Forge and Village events. Separate informal meeting notes were released for this meeting. The following funding is proposed for this improvement: o ICC support = $350,000 — See attached November 23, 2022 [letter]. This funding is an estimate/ placeholder and is subject to change based on further review and scope of future design. o Village support = TBD based on scope Stephen Street The following was discussed related to needed improvements: o Two quadrant gates with cantilevered signals exist at the rail crossing with traffic signals at the adjacent Main Street intersection. The existing traffic signals at Main Street and rail crossing are outdated. 38 Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program vu Agenda/Attendees Meeting Summary Page 4 o Given the age of installations, all new installations are preferred. It was noted that all new installations would also make interim traffic control operations and signal switchover easier. o Budnick Plaza presents an existing uncontrolled pedestrian rail crossing on the northwest quadrant. Pedestrians line up across the tracks in the red box below (and on next page) while waiting to cross Main Street. Village police noted that in busy times there are many people running across the tracks. Geometry at this intersection is also a major concern. A vehicle recently drove onto the tracks and was stuck after mistaking the tracks for a road in a left turn movement. This has also happened in the past. The use of flexible delineators to provide some form of channelization was discussed. This may be a short-term solution, but it does not address other concerns or deficiencies. o Better defining the geometric travel way and turning movements, as well as modifying geometry to restrict and channel pedestrians will be a part of planning an effective design. It will also be important to assess the potential for design of four quadrant gates, which will likely require shifting the Main Street edge of pavement further south by eliminating or relocating some existing on -street parking spaces on the south side of Main Street. The need for pedestrian gates will also be studied. o The Village is prepared to move forward with data collection, planning, design, and construction documents for improvements at this crossing. The Village understands that multiple design concepts and an iterative review process may be required to finalize a preferred design concept. 39 Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program Agenda/Attendees Meeting Summary Page 5 The following funding is proposed for this improvement: o ICC support = $500,000 — See attached November 23, 2022 [letter]. This funding is an estimate/ placeholder and is subject to change based on further review and scope of future design. o Village support = TBD based on scope * Lemont Street The following was discussed related to needed improvements: o Two quadrant gates with post -mounted signals exist at the rail crossing with 4-way stop control at the adjacent Main Street intersection. o Given the age of installations and increase in vehicle and pedestrian traffic, all new installations are likely needed/preferred. o Existing vehicle and pedestrian traffic at this crossing have grown with car shows and other activities. Traffic will increase as Marbella Place (hUps:Hmarbellaoflemont.com/) nears completion, which is under construction just north of the rail crossing on Lemont Street. o It will be important to plan for the future at this crossing as development will increase vehicle and pedestrian traffic exponentially. It will also be important to assess the potential for design of four quadrant gates, which will include the study of pedestrian gates. Traffic signals at the adjacent Main Street roadway intersection with Lemont Street were not discussed in detail at this meeting. Signal warrant analysis has not been conducted. If traffic signals are studied at this location and determined to be warranted per MUTCD standards, the studies would require review by ICC — and if programmed for design and installation, they would most likely require interconnection as well as an ICC petition. o The Village is prepared to move forward with data collection, planning, design, and construction documents for improvements at this crossing. The Village understands that multiple design concepts and an iterative review process may be required to finalize a preferred design concept. The following funding is proposed for this improvement: o ICC support = $1,000,000 — See attached November 23, 2022 [letter]. This funding is an estimate/ placeholder and is subject to change based on further review and scope of future design. o Village support = TBD based on scope -;� Metra Station Pedestrian Crossing The following was discussed related to needed improvements: o The existing condition consists of a bituminous platform pedestrian crossing that is used to connect parking on the north to the station on the south, and parallel platforms on both sides. o No accidents have been reported at this crossing, but there are reports of commuters crossing the tracks at random locations and not using the existing bituminous platform crossing. o Placing inner -track fencing was discussed. The center -to -center of existing rails is very tight, so there are concerns with this application. The use of pedestrian gates was also discussed. o This crossing warrants further research and review. The Village proposes to observe and document commuter onboard ing/offboarding tendencies. Research would also include interviewing station personnel and commuters to understand crossing activities and concerns. Once this due diligence is complete, the Village will provide a white paper summarizing findings and arrange a field meet with appropriate ICC and CN personnel to review viable safety improvement options, if any. Funding has not been identified for this improvement. all Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program ?V4 Agenda/Attendees Meeting Summary Page 6 -;� Industrial Drive The following was discussed related to needed improvements: o The existing condition consists of a rail crossing in close proximity to New Avenue, a parallel mainline roadway under IDOT jurisdiction. Two quadrant gates with post -mounted signals exist at the rail crossing with free flow on New Avenue. o Industrial generators north of the tracks result in frequent queuing on the rail crossing while waiting to turn on to New Avenue. The roadway profile across the tracks is also steep and a challenge to navigate. o New Avenue is not identified for improvement by IDOT in the STIP or MYP. o Providing supplemental striping, signing, and device upgrades consistent with ]DOT Bureau of Operations "Ops-T-06 Signing and Pavement Marking at Railroad Grade Crossings" may be a good safety improvement approach. ICC staff previously discussed with the Village also considering the possibility of installing motorist escape areas or pathways. Funding has not been identified for this improvement. -�, New Petition(s) and Stipulated Agreement(s) — ICC noted the following: A new public rail crossing as part of the extension of Walker Road, or some other improvement not yet identified that affects change at the private rail crossings, would likely be a separate ICC petition. Note that conversion of a private crossing to public crossing would also require an ICC petition. Given the proposed improvements and need for interconnection, the Main-Illinois-Pruxne/Talcott intersection realignment and rail crossing relocation will require an ICC petition, which will most likely be separate from any other petition(s). Proposed improvements at the rail crossings with Holmes Street, Stephen Street, and Lemont Street may be accomplished through ICC stipulated agreement(s). If a new traffic signal installation is warranted at the Main Street intersection with Lemont Street, or other improvements dictate, any one or all of these crossings may require a separate (or combined) ICC petition. Note that a stipulated agreement is only feasible when all parties are in agreement of the proposed improvements. Any contested matters may require a petition to be filed by the Village. Additionally, if traffic signals are warranted at Lemont Street a petition would be required. -;> Other Coordination ICC provided Commission Standard Details for Four Quad Gates and Pedestrian Gates. o ICC provided IDOT Bureau of Operations Ops-T-06 Signing and Pavement Marking at Railroad Grade Crossings, 2020 Update. 4, Next meeting — TBD. -�, Close—12:15pm. 41 Attachment C EXHIBIT A UJI Attendees Village of Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program Agenda/Attendees Meeting Summary Page 7 ❑ John Egofske ieaofskeO-Iemont.il.us Village of Lemont ❑ Jason Berry JBer[y0lemont.il.us Village of Lemont ® George Schafer gschafer-Iemont.il.us Village of Lemont ❑ Michael Stillman stillman(oknightnicastro.com Village Attorney © Marc Maton mmatonO-Iemont.il.us Village Chief of Police ❑ Brian Vercruysse brian.vercruysseO-illinois.govov ICC ® Christopher Murauski Christopher.murauskiO-illinois.gov ICC ® Stanley Milewski stanley.milewskie-illinois.gov ICC ® Thomas Brasseur nicholas.burwellCNcn.ca CN ❑ Michael Shumate mshumate(�fletcher-sippel.com CN ❑ Larry Lloyd larry.11oydQcn.ca CN ❑ Brandon Myers brand on.myersO-c n.ca CN ® Clay Shipley cshipleyD-v-k.net-k.net V&K Attachments [exhibit-1]............................Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program — Aerial Map [exhibit-1A] .........................Lemont Rail Crossing Improvement Program — Summary Tabulation [exhibit-2]............................Walker Road Extension Concept Alternatives [exhibit-3]............................Walker Road Extension Concept Alternatives [exhibit-4]............................Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Realignment Concept Alternatives [letter]..................................ICC CSIP Commitment Letter 42 Exhibit D Intersection Realignment Concept Exhibit E IDOT Phase 1 Kickoff Meeting Conference Report Attachment C EXHIBIT A Client Name Client Location Project Name Route Location Section No. Conference Name: Conference Date, Time: Conference Location: Conference Number: By, Issue Date: VEENSTRA & 1{IMM INC. 552 W. Mughton Road Bclingbrcck, Illinois 60440 63D.755.0290 Pf BBB.630.2034 WWkV.v-kFWt CONFERENCE REPORT Village of Lemont Lemont Village Hall 418 Main Street Lemont, IL 60439 Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Realignment Project Intersection of Main Street (FAU 3587), Illinois Street (FAU 1065), and Pruxne Street (MUN 1072A) 23-00059-00-CH IDOT Phase I Kickoff Meeting August 11, 2023, 10:00am Conference Call (I DOT WebEx) 01 CMS, August 21, 2023 (draft), September 6, 2023 (final) The following Conference Report is assumed correct unless written notice to the contrary is received within ten days of the issue date. ATTENDEES: ❑ John Egofske iegofske(o)lemont.il.us Village of Lemont ❑x Jason Berry JBerry(a)Iemont.il.us Village of Lemont ❑ George Schafer gschafer(Dlemont.il.us Village of Lemont ❑ Michael Stillman stillman(aDknightnicastro.com Village Attorney ❑x Brittany Matyas brittanyC@swmayors.com SCM ❑x Kevin Stallworth kevin.stallworth(a illinois.gov IDOT ❑x Michelle Davis michelle.l.davisd1 a( illinois.gov IDOT ❑x Jason Salley iason.salley(aDillinois.gov IDOT • Jonathan Lloyd lonathan.11oyd(a.illinois.gov IDOT ❑ Eleftherios Masouridis eleftherios.masouridis(aDillinois.gov IDOT ❑ Brian Vercruysse brian.vercruVsse(a_Dillinois.gov ICC ❑ Christopher Murauski christopher.murauski(d�illinois.gov ICC ❑ Stanley Milewski stanley.milewskK@illinois.gov ICC ❑ Thomas Brasseur nicholas.burwell(o)-cn.ca CN ❑ Michael Shumate mshumate a.fletcher-sippel.com CN ❑ Larry Lloyd larry.11oyd(@cn.ca CN ❑ Brandon Myers brandon.myers(a)cn.ca CN x❑ Dustin Sliwa dsliwa(ov-k.net V&K x❑ Clay Shipley cshipley(a.v-k.net V&K BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS 47 Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Realignment Project IDOT Phase I Kickoff Meeting August 11, 2023 Page 2 SUBJECT: IDOT Phase I Kickoff Meeting Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Realignment Project Section No. 23-00059-00-CH Village of Lemont, Cook County MEETING SUMMARY: The following pages summarize presentations, questions, comments, and discussion. A meeting agenda was presented, along with an aerial map of the project location (Exhibit A), and a preliminary ESR exhibit for the project (Exhibit B). Following a rail corridor field review on August 11, 2022, ICC and CN were concerned about rail crossing safety. A combination of outdated passive and active rail crossing controls, lack of controls to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle activity, and unorthodox roadway intersection geometry raised particular concern given the continued rise in multimodal activity that currently exists across road and rail. Following the rail corridor field review, concept geometry for an intersection realignment scenario was developed. The concept was shared with the ICC as part of a proposed comprehensive Rail Crossing Improvement Program in October 2022. The ICC replied to the proposed program in November 2022 by including this improvement in the Fiscal Year 2024 to 2028, Crossing Safety Improvement Program (CSIP). There are two rail lines that pass through the project study area that serve freight and passenger traffic. The rail lines are on the Heritage High Speed Corridor (https://ridertools.metrarail.com/maps- schedules/train-lines/HC/map). This improvement will likely reconstruct and realign Main Street, Illinois Street, Pruxne Street, and Talcott Avenue, for example, similar to the geometry shown in Exhibit C (conceptual only). Improvements will likely include pavement reconstruction, concrete curb and gutter, closed drainage improvements, multi -use path accommodations, commercial access improvements, railroad crossing signals and warning devices, roadway intersection traffic signals, lighting, landscaping, striping, and signing. Proposed improvements will require right-of-way acquisition. Illinois Street and Main Street (east of Illinois Street) are minor arterials under State jurisdiction, Main Street (west of Illinois Street) is a minor arterial under municipal jurisdiction and all other roadways are local roads under municipal jurisdiction. The Forge development (https:Htheforgelive.com/) continues to grow and attract more events. The Forge will continue to use the Pruxne Street and the rail crossing as their main access to the park. The proposed improvements will address ongoing development and the need to accommodate increasing bicycle and pedestrian traffic across Main Street and the Heritage Highspeed Rail Corridor. KA Steel, which is located near The Forge and also uses Pruxne Street as their main access, generates significant truck traffic. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS 'I IJ`i . Attachment C . ■ Al Village of Lemont Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Realignment Project IDOT Phase I Kickoff Meeting August 11, 2023 Page 3 IDOT is currently in Phase II for improvements along Main Street under Section 2020-142-C&DR, Contract 621_30. The project begins just west of Wheeler Drive and ends near IL 83/171. The Village has coordinated with IDOT on this project and will continue to do so as this project develops. This preliminary design concept (Exhibit C) was discussed. The concept was also recently presented to ]CC and CN. The potential for rail crossing quad gates, roadway intersection signalization, preemption/interconnect, and other important design considerations will be addressed with this proposed improvement. IDOT had the following initial design and geometric comments. • Traffic studies and capacity analysis will be required. • Traffic signal warrant analysis is required if a new roadway installation is proposed. • Assuming roadway intersection traffic signals are warranted, concurrent vs. split phase is preferred. • The District does not have any detailed traffic count data. • Intersection design must accommodate WB-65 movements unless the Village directs otherwise by ordinance for the local facilities. Emergency vehicles should also be considered throughout. • The pedestrian crossings should be designed "high visibility". • Combination lighting will likely be part of the roadway intersection design at a minimum, assuming traffic signals are warranted. IDOT lighting guidelines should be followed. • An IDS with profiles will be required. The ESR will be submitted as soon as possible. It was noted that the ESR limits should be extended to also include pavement striping and maintenance of traffic. Regarding noise analysis, it is not expected that once review of design alternatives is complete that the improvements proposed will qualify as a "Type I Project" per Section 20-6.05 of the BLRS Manual. However, to assure that this environmental review is properly vetted, V&K will include this as an agenda item for the FHWA-IDOT Coordination Meeting where a preferred or advanced alternative(s) can be shared. Regarding special waste, a large portion of the project study area is State right-of-way. As such, the Village would like to request that IDOT perform special waste review for the entire ESR limits that would also include non -State right-of-way. It was noted that it was all right for the Village to make this request when submitting the ESR. Proposed improvements will require right-of-way acquisition. If displacements are involved, Environmental Justice review will be required. It was noted that displacements are not anticipated. The project is not anticipated to impact any Section 4(f) properties. There are no structures affected by the proposed improvement. It is anticipated that the project will be constructed without the use of detours. It is expected that this project will be processed for design approval as a Federal Categorical Exclusion. This will ultimately be determined at an FHWA-IDOT Coordination Meeting. Regarding drainage studies, IDOT noted that intersection improvements typically require a Location Drainage Technical Memorandum (LDTM) that would include an Existing Drainage Plan and Proposed Drainage Plan. BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS WO Attachment C EXHIBIT A Village of Lemont Main-Illinois-Pruxne Intersection Realignment Project [DOT Phase I Kickoff Meeting August 11, 2023 Page 4 Crash history should be documented. Crash data has been received from IDOT. Record plans have been received from IDOT. The PPI has been drafted and sent to SCM. An ICC petition will be required for improvements associated with the rail crossing. It was noted that concurrence from ICC and CN must be documented before design approval is granted. Meeting adjourned at 10:50am. Attachments: Exhibit .............Aerial Location Map Exhibit B.............Draft ESR Exhibit Exhibit C.............Preliminary Project Concept BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS 50 Exhibit F Environmental Survey Request (ESR) Exhibits I 15 fw r a �p a,♦.' o ti "• IWU _ 1 1W; I Z.y w .L6 e�i,l0 I v r i1 b � 1 LD r ,952 3 Y rFg;'�`\ X. CAT ERINE STREET _ - � I LF oo=1 Y lz o I I JULhSTREET Ko 1 JI N w u •_ IgIF- 3 �' m o W W a _ w 1 I I I .�.� GRANT STREET -------- -- ---- W -_---- --- zzC. w _ _ _ LLI J � pj Q !df 0 - •_—_— 0 N1^^ LO I oM y� zs LL �1z1 way; a 0 - ' o ERINE STREET. - ? �I1 c U JULIASTREET oSw� gJ e 3 F GRANT STREET W Iwo 2 !a7 0 m LO Exhibit G Engineer's Estimate of Hard and Soft Costs Attachment C EXHIBIT A V4d ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS Main Street at Illinois Street Intersection and Talcott Avenue (Pruxne Street) Rail Crossing Rail Crossing and Roadway Intersection Safety Improvements N0. ITEM UNIT CITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST PERCENT OF TOTAL 1 TREE REMOVAL ACRE 0.8 $ 12,000.00 $ 9,600.00 0.29% 2 EARTH EXCAVATION CU YD 4,250 $ 32.00 $ 136,000.00 4.18% 3 TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE, 4" SQ YD 7,200 $ 10.00 $ 72,000.00 2.21% 4 COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE REMOVAL EACH 6 $ 2,500.00 $ 15,000.00 0.46% 5 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, TYPE B 6" SO YD 2,347 $ 12.00 $ 28,160.00 0.87% 6 HOT -MIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE, I1-45, N50 TON 239 $ 105.00 $ 25,088.00 0.77% 7 HOT -MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX "C", N50 TON 239 $ 105.00 $ 25,088.00 0.77% 8 PAVED SHOULDER REMOVAL So YD 320 $ 22.00 $ 7,040.00 0.22% 9 PAVEMENT REMOVAL SQ YD 3,278 $ 27.00 $ 88.500.00 2.72% 10 SIDEWALK REMOVAL So FT 3,690 $ 6.00 $ 22,140.00 0.68% 11 COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL FOOT 2,295 $ 26.00 $ 59,670.00 1.83% 12 AGGREGATE SUBGRADE IMPROVEMENT 12" SQ YD 9,583 $ 22.00 $ 210,833.33 6.48% 13 HOT -MIX ASPHALT PAVEMENT (FULL -DEPTH), 11- SQ YD 8,333 $ 52.00 $ 433,333.33 13.31% 14 HOT -MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, VARIABLE DEPTH (SCARIFICATION) SO YD 4,100 $ 3.50 $ 14,350.00 0.44% 15 HOT -MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX "D", N70 TON 240 $ 105.00 $ 25,200.00 0.77% 16 HOT -MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS, 8" SQ YD 195 $ 65.00 $ 12,675.00 0.39% 17 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, 81NCH SO YD 212 $ 85.00 $ 18,020.00 0.55% 18 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.24 FOOT 4,420 $ 33.00 $ 145,860.00 4.48% 19 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12 FOOT 310 $ 33.00 $ 10,230.00 0.31% 20 NEW ROADWAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION L SUM 1 $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 12.29% 21 REMOVE AND REPLACE RAIL CROSSING DEVICES WITH QUAD GATES AND PED GATES L SUM 1 $ 676,000.00 $ 750,000.00 23.04 22 ROAD AND RAIL SIGNAL INTERCONNECT/ PREEMPTION L SUM 1 $ 100,000.00 $ 125,000.00 3.84 23 RAILROAD CROSSING SURFACE LSUM 1 $ 125.000.00 $ 130,000.00 3.99% 24 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND TEMPORARY CONDITIONS, ROAD AND RAIL INTERSECTIONS L SUM 1 $ 100.000.00 $ 100,000.00 3.07/ 25 RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY FENCING, DECORATIVE FOOT 3,200 $ 52.00 $ 166,400.00 5.11 26 DETECTABLE WARNINGS EACH 16 $ 600.00 $ 9,600.00 0.29% 27 RETAINING WALL (LOW PROFILE) SO FT 1,450 $ 55.00 $ 79,750.00 2.45% 28 INLET, MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS EACH 20 $ 450.00 $ 9,000.00 0.28% 29 MONUMENT REMOVAL EACH 6 $ 1,000.00 $ 6,000.00 0.18% 30 UTILITY RELOCATION LSUM 1 $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 3.69% ---- NOTE: SEEDING, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNING, RESTORATION, TC&P, FIELD OFFICE, CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT, AND MOBILIZATION IS INCLUDED IN CONTINGENCY HARD COSTS SUB -TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 3,254,537.67 100% (2011) CONTINGENCY $ 650,907.53 --- (Rounded Down) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 3,900,000.00 ---- RIGHT-OF-WAY COSTS ACRE 0.35 $ 371,000.00 $ 130,000.00 ---- GRAND TOTAL $ 4,030,000.00- Made By: CMS Dale: 12/05124 Checked By: Dale: 55 �'- Lochner CONSULTANT AGREEMENT Owner: Village of Lemont, Illinois Client: Village of Lemont, Illinois (Village) Consultant: H.W. Lochner, Inc. ("Lochner") 225 W. Washington St., 12"' Floor Chicago, IL 60606 Date: January 7, 2025 Project: Stephen Street & Lemont Street Grade Crossing Improvements EXHIBIT B Lochner and the Client (collectively, the "Parties" and individually, a "Party") agree as follows: 1. Agreement. This Agreement is a contract between Lochner and the Client for Lochner to perform consulting, engineering, and/or design services on the Project. 2. Lochner. Lochner is the Client's Consultant for the services listed in this Agreement which Lochner is contracting to provide for the Project, and Lochner shall facilitate the exchange of information between or among Lochner and the Client, Lochner and other consultants retained by the Client, and Lochner and other consultants that Lochner may have retained for the Project. All communications between Lochner and the Client shall be through Lochner unless the Client authorizes otherwise. Lochner represents that it is a properly licensed engineering firm and is registered to practice its profession and to conduct business in the State of Illinois. 3. Scope of Services. Lochner shall perform the services set forth in Attachment A Scope of Work/Services, as awarded herein (the "Services"). 4. Compensation. The Client shall compensate Lochner in accordance with Attachment B Agreement Price and Schedule of Values 5. Schedule. Lochner shall perform its services with a timeframe mutually agreed to by Lochner and the Village. Lochner shall strive to cooperate with and to coordinate its Services with the activities of all other parties to the Project, including other consultants retained by the Client. 6. Additional Services. If the Client requests Lochner to perform services that Lochner believes to be in addition to the Services specified in Section 3 of this Agreement, and for which Lochner believes it is entitled to additional time or additional compensation, before commencing with any Additional Services Lochner shall submit a written cost estimate and revised schedule in accordance with Section 15 of this Agreement. Lochner shall not commence with any Additional Services without written authorization by the Client. 7. Standard of Care. The standard of care applicable to Lochner's Scope of Services shall be the degree of skill and care normally employed by professionals engaged to perform services similar to the Services required herein at the same time and in the same geographic area as the performance of Services hereunder and on projects similar in size and scope to the Project. In the event a standard of care is prescribed by statute, such statutory formulation shall be the Standard of Care. cf— Lochner EXHIBIT B 8. Payment. Lochner shall send invoices to the Client at monthly intervals. Payment will be made to Lochner for invoiced Services not more than thirty (30) days following submittal of invoice to the Client. 9. Correction of Work. Lochner shall correct any Services that fail to conform to the Standard of Care set forth in Section 7 of this Agreement at Lochner's own expense. 10. Termination. Lochner may terminate this Agreement upon five (5) days written notice if the Client breaches any term of this Agreement. The Client may terminate this Agreement upon seven (7) days written notice without cause for the Client's own convenience. If this Agreement is terminated by Lochner for the Client's breach, the Client shall be liable to Lochner for all costs and expenses that Lochner incurred prior to the termination as a result of the Client's breach. If this Agreement is terminated by the Client for its convenience, Client shall be liable to Lochner for all costs and expenses that Lochner incurred prior to the termination. 11. Insurance. Lochner will provide and maintain the following policies of insurance under the terms and conditions set forth below: 1. Professional Liability Insurance retroactive to the date of commencement of Lochner's services in relation to the Project with a per claim and aggregate limit in the amount of the greater of $1.0 million. This policy shall be maintained in effect for a period of one (1) year after completion of all Lochner's Services hereunder. 2. Commercial General Liability ("CGL") Insurance in the amount of $1.0 million per occurrence, $1.0 million aggregate limit, and $1.0 million products and completed operations aggregate limit. In addition to the coverage provided by the Commercial General Liability Insurance, if not already included in such coverage, such insurance shall also provide coverage for personal injury, bodily injury, property damage, products -completed operations (for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work) and broad form contractual liability. 3. Comprehensive Automobile Liability ("Auto") Insurance in the amount of $1.0 million per occurrence, and $1.0 million aggregate limit. In addition to the coverage provided by the Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, if not already included in such coverage, such insurance shall also provide coverage for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage arising out of owned, hired, leased and non -owned vehicles, automobiles, trucks and trailers. 4. Workmen's Compensation Insurance in the amount of the statutory maximum, if there is one, and if there is no statutory maximum, in the amount of $1.0 million and Employer's Liability Insurance of at least $1.0 million. 5. Umbrella Excess Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $3.0 million each occurrence, and $3.0 million aggregate limit. The Umbrella Excess Liability Insurance shall be written on an umbrella excess basis over, and shall follow form to, the Commercial General Liability Insurance policy, the Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance policy, and the Employer's Liability Insurance policy. The Umbrella Excess Liability Insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide defense coverage obligations. Lochner will include coverage for its subcontractors in its policies or obtain from each subcontractor equivalent insurance as required of Lochner hereunder. The provisions of Section 11 shall apply equally to Lochner's subcontractors as they do to Lochner. All insurance policies will be endorsed to provide that the insurance company will give the Client at least thirty (30) days written notice of cancellation or material change prior to such cancellation or modification. Prior to commencement of Lochner's Scope of Services hereunder, Lochner shall provide the Client with certificates of insurance evidencing the requirements set forth herein. 2 cf— Lochner 12. Indemnification. Lochner agrees to indemnify the Client and its officers, directors, members, managers, employees and assigns (the "Indemnitees") from and against liability, claims, damages, losses and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness costs, other litigation costs, judgments, settlements and economic losses) (collectively the "Losses" and individually, a "Loss") arising out of or resulting from negligent performance of any Services or duties under this Agreement by Lochner, its subcontractors, lower -subcontractors, or agents of any tier or their respective employees provided, however, that in the event of a Loss arising out of damages to persons or property, the foregoing obligation (1) shall not require Lochner to indemnify any Indemnitee for Losses other than to the extent caused by the act, omission or default of Lochner, its contractors, subcontractors, lower -subcontractors, materialmen, or agents of any tier or their respective employees, where such is prohibited by law, and (2) shall not require Lochner to indemnify any Indemnitee for Losses caused in whole or in part by any act, omission, or default of the Indemnitee, where such is prohibited by law. If the obligation to indemnify set forth in this Section is broader than that allowed by applicable law, this Section should be interpreted as providing the broadest indemnification obligation permitted and should be limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that law. Lochner shall reimburse the Client for its reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness costs and other litigation costs to enforce this Section 12 and shall survive the termination or full performance of this Agreement by either or both Lochner and/or the Client. Section 12 is to be read separately and independently of Section 11 and the additional insured obligations therein contained. 13. Waiver of Immunity. In claims against any person or entity indemnified under Section 12 by an employee of Lochner, a subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone for whose acts they may be liable (a "Claimant"), the indemnification obligation under Section 12 shall not be limited by a limitation on amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the Claimant's employer under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee benefit acts. 14. Ownership of Documents. If the Agreement requires that any of the Client's documents, drawings, plans, specifications, or other work product are, or shall become, the property of another person, Lochner shall, at the Client's request, assign all rights of ownership of any like document prepared by Lochner to the same person. 15. Chances. Client may, by written direction only, make changes, revisions, additions, or deletions (collectively called "changes") to this Agreement. Any claim by Lochner for an adjustment under this paragraph must be asserted in writing fully supported by factual documentation to the Client, within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of receipt by Lochner of the written change order from the Client, or within such extension of this period as Client, in its sole discretion, may grant in writing at Lochner's request prior to expiration of said period. Claims arising under this Agreement shall be decided in the state or federal courts located in Illinois. 16. Confidentiality. Lochner acknowledges, that as part of Lochner's relationship with the Client, it will have access to information that is not publicly available ("Confidential Information"). Lochner agrees that it will maintain strict confidentiality with respect to such Confidential Information and will not, directly, or indirectly, disseminate it or use it for any purpose unrelated to Lochner's obligations under this Agreement. Lochner shall not, without the prior written consent of the Client, make any public statement, announcement or release concerning the Project or the Confidential Information to trade publications, the press, or any other individual, corporation, partnership, or entity except as may be necessary to comply with the requirements of any applicable law, governmental order or regulation. In the event Lochner believes it is required to disclose any Confidential Information in order to comply with any applicable law, governmental order or regulation, Lochner shall promptly cf- Lochner EXHIBIT B notify the Client of same with sufficient time to allow the Client to object or otherwise take actions to prevent the disclosure of such Confidential Information. 17. Quality Control/Quality Assurance. Lochner shall perform Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QC/QA) commensurate with the Standard of Care throughout the provision of all Services by Lochner pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 18. Miscellaneous Provisions. 1. Assignment. Lochner shall not assign this Agreement or the benefits arising therefrom without the prior written consent of the Client. 2. Integration. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between Lochner and the Client and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. 3. Third Parties. There are no third -party beneficiaries to this Agreement other than as expressly indicated in Section 11 (Insurance) and Section 12 (Indemnification). 4. Invalidity. In the event any provision or part of a provision of this Agreement is found invalid by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, (i) the other provisions or parts of the provision of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding such finding, and (ii) the Agreement shall be interpreted to, as closely as possible, effectuate the purpose the original Agreement language. 5. Mutually Negotiated. The Parties acknowledge that the terms and conditions of this Agreement have been the subject of mutual negotiation, and that this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the Parties and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any Party by virtue of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement. 6. Survival. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the provisions of this Agreement providing for limitation of or protection against liabilities between the Parties, shall survive termination of the Agreement and/or completion of the Services hereunder. 7. Limitation of Liability. Lochner's liability for any claim or breach of Standard of Care shall be limited to the amount of its Compensation as defined in Section 4. 8. Notices. Unless otherwise provided herein, all notices, requests, consents, approvals, demands and other communications to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given upon (a) the date of delivery when hand delivered to the respective Parties as set forth below, or (b) actual receipt as evidenced by proof of delivery by a national courier service or the United States Postal Service, addressed to the respective Parties at the following addresses: Notice to Lochner: Notice to Client: Jason Moller, PE George J. Schafer Director of Transportation Planning Village Administrator H. W. Lochner, Inc. Village of Lemont 225 W. Washington St., 121 Floor 418 Main Street Chicago, IL 60606 Lemont, IL 60439 9. Mutual Waiver of Consequential Damages. In no event shall either Party, their members, managers, affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, or shareholders be liable to the other Party for any special, incidental or consequential damages, direct or indirect, including, but not limited to, lost revenue, lost profits, financing costs, overhead, penalties, fines, liquidated damages and lost 4 cf— Lochner EXHIBIT B opportunities, whether incurred by a Party or by third parties to that Party may be liable, whether sounding in breach of contract, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict or statutory liability or otherwise, arising from or relating to the Services under this Agreement. 10. Electronically Produced Documents. Electronically produced documents will be submitted in data files compatible with AutoCAD Release 2020. Lochner makes no warranty as to the compatibility of the data files beyond the above specified hardware and release or version of the stated software. Because data stored on electronic media can deteriorate undetected or be modified without Lochner's knowledge, the electronic data files submitted to the Sponsor or other Agencies will have an acceptance period of thirty (30) days. If during that period the Sponsor or other Agencies find any errors or omissions in the files, Lochner will correct the errors or omissions as a part of the basic Agreement. Lochner will not be responsible for maintaining copies of the submitted electronic data files after the acceptance period. 11. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost and Construction Cost. Since Lochner has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Lochner's opinions of probable Project Cost and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of Lochner's experience and qualifications and represent its best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but Lochner cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Project or Construction Cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by Lochner. However, Lochner represents that it will use reasonable engineering care and judgment commonly exercised by an engineer in the same or similar circumstances in making and transmitting such cost estimates to the Client. 12. Force Majeure. Any delay or failure of Lochner in the performance of its required obligations hereunder shall be excused if and to the extent caused by acts of God, war, riot, strike, fire, storm, flood, windstorm, discovery or uncovering of hazardous or toxic materials or causes beyond the reasonable control of Lochner, provided that prompt written notice of such delay or suspension be given by Lochner to the Client. Upon receipt of said notice, if necessary, the time for performing shall be extended for a period of time reasonably necessary to overcome the effect of such delays and Lochner shall be reimbursed for the cost of such delays. 13. Client's Responsibilities. a. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for Lochner to enter upon public and private property as required for it to perform his/her services. b. Assist in approvals and permits from all governmental entities having jurisdiction over the project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the project. c. Designate in writing a person to act as Client representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define Sponsor policies and decisions. d. Give prompt written notice to Lochner whenever Client observes or knows of any development that affects the scope or timing of Lochner's services. e. Pay publishing cost for advertisements of notices, public hearings, request for bids, and other similar items. The Sponsor shall pay for all permits and licenses that may be required by local, state or federal authorities; and shall secure the necessary land, easements and rights -of -way required for the project. 5 cf— Lochner f. Available information relating to environmental conditions at the property, including any permits, clearances, investigations, and remediation required for federal, state, and local agencies identified by environmental consultants for the Sponsor in currently available reports. H.W. LOCHNER, INC. By: 419" C - C�- Title: Vice President Date: January 9, 2025 Attachments VILLAGE OF LEMONT, IL By: Title: Village Administrator Date: February 10, 2025 Attachment A - Scope of Work/Services Attachment B - Agreement Price and Schedule of Values Attachment C — Lochner Tech Memo 9/30/24 0 cf- Lochner ATTACHMENT A Scope of Work/Services EXHIBIT B The Scope of Work under this agreement is intended to increase safety at railroad grade crossings at Lemont Street and Stephen Street. In assisting the Village, Lochner will develop construction plans for improvements at each of these grade crossings so that the Village can advertise the projects for construction. The improvements at each location (Lemont Street and Stephen Steet) will be developed consistent with the Long -Term Improvement recommendations presented in Lochner's Memorandum dated September 30, 2024. Lochner will prepare plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) for a final submittal to the Village of Lemont. Our work includes preparation of engineering plans, specifications, and construction cost estimate. The proposed improvements consist of the following: Lemont Street — Replacement of the two -quadrant railroad crossing signals and gates with four - quadrant signals and gates, including pedestrian gates. Sidewalk removal and widening will be required in all four quadrants, including crosswalk ramps and detectable warnings. Self -closing swing gates will be provided in the northwest, southwest and southeast quadrants. Perimeter fencing will be designed to close any gaps between the proposed improvements and the planned perimeter fencing that will be installed by others as part of a different project. Stephen Street - Replacement of the two -quadrant railroad crossing signals and gates with four - quadrant signals and gates, including pedestrian gates. Sidewalk removal and widening will be required in all four quadrants. Self -closing swing gates will be provided in the northeast, southwest and southeast quadrants, and possibly in the northwest quadrant depending on the extent of utility relocation. Main Street will be reconfigured through the removal of parking along the south side of the street and the north curb line will be shifted south. The existing roadway drainage will be affected, and some drainage structures will be moved. Multiple traffic signal poles and light poles will be relocated. The existing exit from the park area to the crossing will be eliminated. Perimeter fencing will be designed to close any gaps between the proposed improvements and the planned perimeter fencing that will be installed by others as part of a different project. It is assumed that all construction involving removal and replacement of the railroad crossing signals and gates or any work on or around the tracks will be done by railroad forces. The existing interconnection between the railroad signal and the roadway traffic signal at the Stephen Street crossing will remain in place and will not need to be redesigned or improved. Deliverables The PS&E is to be prepared in accordance with the latest IDOT Standards Specifications, American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way - Manual for Railway Engineering, Illinois Standard Specifications for Water and Sewer Construction in Illinois, and Village of Lemont requirements. One set of plans and specifications are to be prepared that will address the proposed improvements to both crossings concurrently. Draft (90%) plans and specifications will be provided to the Village for review and comment prior to submittal of the final PS&E documents. cf- Lochner Plan Sheets Plan Sheets for Lochner's work, unless noted otherwise, can be summarized as follows: • Title Sheet • Notes • Summary of Quantities • Schedule of Quantities • Typical Sections • Detour Plan • Roadway Plan and Profile • Roadway Drainage/Utilities Plan • Pavement Marking Plan • Erosion Control Plan and Details • Plaza Plan and Details • Lighting Plan (limited to pole relocations) • Traffic Signal Plans (limited to existing cabinet relocation) • Details o ADA/PROWAG Sidewalk Details o Perimeter Fence Details — provided by others o Railroad Crossing Gate Layout — support by railroad • Plaza Details • Cross Sections Supplemental Specifications • Utility Information • Detour Information • Traffic Signal Information (limited to relocating existing cabinet) • Roadway Lighting Information (limited to pole relocations) • Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Requirements • Railroad Flagging Requirements • Right of Entry Requirements • Plaza specifications • Fence specifications EXHIBIT B Supplement analysis and calculations • Traffic Management Plan —due to IDOT adjacent jurisdiction for detour routing • Existing and Proposed Stormwater Conveyance Calculations for a 10-yr storm design and I00 yr storm check only. (does not include calculations for detention). 0 Cf- Lochner Exclusions Land acquisition legal documents and/or drawings Topographic Survey Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Railroad & ICC Coordination Signal/Crossing Interconnect Design Crossing gate details (railroad designed and supplied) Permitting Contractor bid review Contract letting support Construction engineering and inspection (CEI) 0 Cf- Lochner ATTACHMENT B Agreement Price /Schedule of Values ius EXHIBIT B IN191 lawo. WLU F-U L m S gcc fit W O x 7 3 LL z to O W O V d w N H G - U a w rn H J z O V U. O w a com $y � to 0 O ,c v .0 a U O J d E z LL C r 3 H C O t3 d E �L 04. L 3 z O rn .7 c E m d O Ca n E E 8 c a •� v C N MW U W U o cc LOU Z m m C9 c c 8@ o v w .0 7 C c J N N _ C C c ~ m rLmo H Y N 91 ~ s U=z w N 0 O o N wwuj Q U. LL Z}}O h•.0 X J o� O G.1 W J ~ w z �- O a = 0 N W zz 0 H- Q ss o o N LLB a G C w V ~ N 2 Q w Z O U 0 0 �Mo C? U) _ co m O 0 cn L.. C r � O d Q N N M M T- T- � M 6> N N 0 N C4 M L y O r z N O rn� oQ �U m N Xw 0 M OR Go U-i N O N � w- .p- O N � C 0) C m a n. EXHIBIT B Local Public Agency County Section Number Villacie of Lemont I Cook JTBD Consultant 1 Subconsultant Name Job Number H.W. Lochner, Inc PAYROLL RATES EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET FIXED RAISE MAXIMUM PAYROLL RATEr 86.00 ESCALATION FACTORI 1.83% CLASSIFICATION IDOT PAYROLL RATES ON FILE CALCULATED RATE Principal $86.05 $86.06 Project Manager Ili $86.00 $86.00 Project Manager 11 $80.241 81.71 Project Manager 1 $66.74 $67.96 Engineer Associate 1 $35.75 $36.41 Engineer 1 $47.08 $47.94 Engineer II $58.68 $59.76 Engineer IV $83.74 $85.28 Project Accounting Specialist $41.51 $42.27 CADD Manager $73.50 $74.85 Planning Manager $55.29 $56.30 Planner 1 $35.58 $36.23 BLR 05514 (Rev. 02/09/23) Printed 1/9/2025 8:13 AM RATES Page 1 of 1 Local Public e (Waage 0f Lemont , Consultant t Subconsultant Name H.W. Lochner, Inc Job Number I �- DIRECT COSTS WORKSHEET LIM ALL direct coed nquimd for Mils proJaaL Those not listed on the form will net be eilgbk for reimbursement by the LPA on ft. pro)ea. EXHIBIT D COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (CECS) WORKSHEET REM ALLOWABLE OUANTrry CONTRACT RATE TOTAL Lodgng er GOVERNORS TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD) a 19P to staff rate malrimumi .___.._.__ 30.W Lodging Taxes and Fees er GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL CONTROL BOARDS Actual Cost Air Fare(n___..�ce. Ch rake, actual cast, retjuires mfntrnnum lure vreeks' >vilh error 0)OT approval _ $0.00 Vehicle Mileage ar GOVERNORS TRAVEL CONTROL BOARD) Up to state rate maximum 200 $0.67 $134.00 Vehicle Owned or Leased $32.50/haff day (4 hours or Kass) or $651full day C. $65.00 $0.00 Vehicle Rental Actual Cost (Up to $55/day) - $0.D0 Tolls -- - - - Actual Cost 1 $50.00 $50.00 Parking_�._�... Actual Cost $0.00 Overtime Premium portion (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Shill Differential - Actual Cost (Based on Alan's policy) $0.00 Overnight Delivery/Postage/Courier Service y Actual Cost (Submltsuppordng documentation) 1 $100 00 $100 00 Copies of DellverabletuWars (in-house) Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) $0.00 Copies of Defiverables/Wars (Outside) - Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 1 $500.00 $500.00 Project Specific Insurance Actual Cost $0.00 Monuments (Permanent) Actual Cost $0.00 Photo Processing Actual Cost $0.00 2-Way Radio (Survey or Phase III Only) --_µ Actual Cost $0.00 Telephone Usage (Traffic System Monitoring Only) Actual Cost - _ $0.00 CADD Actual Cost (Max $15Awtar) - _ $0.00 Web Site Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 0 $200.00 $0.00 Advertisements Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) 0 $750.00 $0.00 Public Meeting Facility Rental Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) .� 0 $750.00 $0.00 Public Meeting Exhibits/Renderings d Equipment Actual Cost (Submit supporting documentation) _^ 0 $1,000.00 $0.00 Recording Fees Actual Cost $0.00 » Transcriptions (specific to project) Actual Coat ------ $0.00 Courthouse Fees Actual Cost $0.00 Storm Sewer Cleaning and Televising Actual Cost (Requires 23 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Traffic Control and Protection Actual Cost (Requires 2.3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Aerial Photography and Mapping Actual Cost (Requires 23 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Uglily Exploratory Trenching Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Testing of Soil Samples Actual Cost $0.00 Lab Services Actual Cost (Provide breakdown of each cost) $0.00 Equipment and/or Specialized Equipment Rental Actual Cost (Requires 2-3 quotes with IDOT approval) $0.00 Various as needed Actual Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS: $7K00 SLR 85514 (Rev. 0?AW3) �rrtod lfg,=5 8:14 AM DIRECT COSTS Zoe 1 of 1 f'- w w Y O U) U w U W U U� Yw O� Q W ~ J Q � Z O W u_ O U H OQ U� F-- U) w U) O U m x w wC W V 0 Co 0 O LA w Q Q W W O M�— EXHIBIT Et N � 0 O O -IO C -.,0O O G D O C3. tNO, t0 ® m aCD No d (7 O O h [0 4n O N N M O O p 0 � O 0 O O 1 C C O O O J _ CO Oai N Lo n 1 _ OM0 t a00 t O O st 0> d O 00 td M M O cZ ,ci O M O O ul 01 U) W w U)uj r; U T 7 F- O w to LO Da) O N 0300)0O N LO (D (D ' ° N w corncm vv n w � k a w x 1n N CO O cD 00 ' 'D F- M �t� CD O inr O M �rao00 -t V'cli aw q z Cl)av LO ED ,-0 im W w } 0 Oz LL CO LO CO CO N 00 N <t d' O O M C- co N M N M N J M M N 0 s1 rK 4 a co O LO CO N (.0r' to R' LO 00 M 0 x LL Q 1n en (n U) L N 0 'O N V2o 1- ' - O w c 0 fl � 0 I! b ♦+ } D O 5 « mco to � u U U > C (D a O = v F W a c � C7 m co UN N = fll @ E a N 0cn a�i`�=nw c' � 0 O (6 C n' :. d .O Uoacp�wU� O U L U) W v w a J D O Z w C9 W r N I rl H uJ w x w w w Z U) Y Olf U w U U) w U w U) Z Q J Z 0 U w 0 w Q w 0 Z X w °o 1p � I I I X m a � C N O - > o 0 0 C 7 e m O O O Q u Q. M (D i a U N f�CL __ 12 N O O O a � 2 'O N N � _ O -T E A o a o ME e A to Cl) g u a. co 0 m to o cli 0 scoa 0 = � 0.. � o m a TF 0 x w v °' rn y m a 3 Q a r-- m O 3 0 r� � oo a _ U a O � N 0 0 ° O QD x tm a' 60 O o Q `o a a 0 U � o 0 0 S o cm �T > 0 ti rn (n ro o Q o 0 h to o e� F-- o {6 N c0 V O a o N co 00 ti O a. 3 O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q S O m O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 �J W ' (Y F O O O O O O V C' 01 w h" CO Ln r- N N N CO V' O M 2 M N (D Q 0 WO CO 0 coM h (O cD M h �r M m w 'V' n U7 Cl) Z O J H N O 0 C 'v ti Q m m (U m o m 4 - m t- tn d J C C Q d cm C •a y .o C C d 0 C U o 0 0 0 0- A- awwww Q.Ua a( M- BIT B o N O to In O J CO I U. 0 IN F- w W 2 0Im z .r+ C � C .Q Q U v O _ � J RJR C CL o 5 R3 43 O1 J Vp �_ 00 S a II p d v� C7 - N o t0 0 O G 0- in p o x a a L� o $ o x � m o 3 d CIS r o m CL o L o 'o 0 x v zA o rn 7r d v rm) N C o O -Ic O d e 0 a O O O �. U ) III In I I � O x 9 M tV yy� y y M v> IS ECD o 0 0 W a Cl) U i o O N x T Q 69 N +� o ,n w CL o G ° o x rn W O O h. �t � P N N OOR � N i s~ d O w W O �O M h w W M i+ 'T m to u.) OO N Vt �t h w to w M x V) Z m O a rn `D J @ c E m m h Y. rn m rn m rn m o N O m (15 O Q (� a d C m m m 2 N 0) N a`t m r J Q v v c v c c 'c c li L V o IF) 0 .� 0 0 0) m m a CL a a w w w w CL 0 � a d —LLL N G Q (?- Lochner ATTACHMENT C Lochner Tech Memo 9/30/24 11 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B cf— Lochner 22S West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 omce 312.372.7346 FAx 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com MEMORANDUM Date: September 30, 2024 To: Project File From: Dave Shannon, PE and Janusz Wielgos, PE RE: Lemont Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements Lemont Street and Stephen Street 1. Background The Village of Lemont is located in Cook County, Illinois approximately 24 miles southwest of downtown Chicago. Although first platted as Keepataw in 1836 and Athens in 1839, the Village was not officially incorporated until 1873. Lemont is located at the boundary between Cook, Du Page and Will Counties in an area that continues to develop and grow. The downtown area can be described as a commercial core with a street wall of structures built up to the front property line and to the side property lines with party walls. Roadways include sidewalks with street trees, curb and gutter and parallel parking. The area also has some streetscape improvements including brick pavers, benches, and period appropriate lighting. Tracks of the Canadian National Railway pass through the Village of Lemont and cross multiple roadways at -grade, including Stephen Street and Lemont Street. Due to new development in the area, the proximity of recreational facilities near the tracks, periodic special events that draw large crowds, a history of fatal pedestrian accidents and problematic roadway geometrics, the Village of Lemont desires to make improvements that would make this area safer for all users. The purpose of this study is to identify feasible improvements that would increase motorist and pedestrian safety in the area along the tracks near Lemont and Stephen Streets. 2. Project Study Area This study focuses on the at -grade crossings of Lemont Street and Stephen Street. Other crossings are being studied separately. Due to the proximity of Main Street to the crossings, the intersections of the two streets at Main Street are also included in the analysis. 2.1. Roadways 2.1.1. Lemont Street Lemont Street is a north -south roadway in the project area. Its northern terminus is at the I&M Canal where it is reduced to a pedestrian bridge across the canal. A new mixed -use development is being constructed at the corner of Lemont Street and Canal Street. EXHIBIT B cf- Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 omce 312.372.7346 rnx 312,372.8208 hwlochner.com Between Canal Street and Main Street, Lemont Street is 35 feet wide with curb and gutter. Concrete sidewalks are located on both sides of the roadway. The Village of Lemont hasjurisdiction over Lemont Street. Lemont Street is classified as a local street. 2.1.2. Stephen Street Stephen Street is a north -south roadway in the project area. It crosses the I&M Canal but does not cross the Sanitary and Ship Canal. Between Canal Street and Main Street, Stephen Street is 30 feet wide with curb and gutter. Concrete sidewalks are located on both sides of the roadway. In the project study area, Stephen Street is lined with commercial and retail establishments. The Village of Lemont hasjurisdiction over Lemont Street. Lemont Street is classified as a local street. 2.1.3. Main Street Main Street is an east -west roadway in the project area. Main Street is 30 feet wide with curb and gutter. Concrete sidewalks are located on both sides of the roadway. In the project study area, Main Street is lined with commercial and retail establishments. The Village of Lemont hasjurisdiction over Lemont Street. Lemont Street is classified as a local street. 2.2. Railroad Two mainline railroad tracks owned by the Canadian National Railway pass through the project study area on a general southwest -northeast alignment. A 2°-15' curve in the tracks is located near Lemont Street and some existing buildings block the sight line of the railroad from the Stephen Street crossing of the tracks. The tracks are primarily used for freight trains, but there is also Amtrak and Metra Heritage Corridor service on this line. 2.2.1. Lemont Street Crossing The Lemont Street crossing is included in the Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) Grade Crossing Inventory as number 289736R and was last updated on 7/5/2023. The maximum speed allowed on the line is 79 mph. The inventory data sheet indicates that 16 trains per day can be expected on the tracks, but that number is from 2015 and may no longer be accurate. The crossing is protected by flashing lights and 2-quadrant gates. There are no sidewalk gates for pedestrians. Immediately south of the crossing is an intersection with Main Street. The Main Street intersection has four-way stop control and the stop sign for southbound traffic is located north of the tracks, approximately 80 feet from the edge of the through lane along Main Street. 2.2.2. Stephen Street Crossing The Stephen Street crossing is included in the Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) Grade Crossing Inventory as number 289735J and was last updated on 7/5/2023. The EXHIBIT B cf- Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 office 312.372.7346 Fax 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com maximum speed allowed on the line is 79 mph. The inventory data sheet indicates that 16 trains per day can be expected on the tracks, but that number is from 2015 and may no longer be accurate. The crossing is protected by flashing lights and 2-quadrant gates. There are no sidewalk gates for pedestrians. Immediately south of the crossing is an intersection with Main Street, which is controlled by a traffic signal. The signal is interconnected with the crossing protection. The public space west of Stephen Street also has access to the grade crossing approximately 30 west of Stephen Street. The crossing does not have any protection signals or gates for pedestrians. 2.3. Historic District The Lemont Downtown Commercial District was added to the National Register of Historic Places by the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service in 2016. According to the application for listing, the Lemont Downtown Commercial District consists of 14 blocks and 16 acres located along Stephen Street, Main Street, and Canal Street. The district remains vital to the historical significance of the town and over time, this area has reinvented itself without destroying its heart and history. Almost every period is represented in the area's wide variety of high -style architecture and common 19t"- century vernacular and 20t"-century popular types. Lemont is one of the canal towns included in the Illinois and Michigan (I&M) and Canal National Heritage Corridor designated as I&M Canal; and canal -related historic resources in 1984. Although the heart of the district is commercial, it does include a number of historic mixed -use properties. Of the 63 total buildings in the area, 54 are considered contributing to the character of the historic district. The period of significance is listed as 1858- 1959. The listing only identifies structures as contributing to the historic character of the area. No other elements, such as roadways, bridges or railroad facilities, are listed as contributing. 3. Crash History and Safety 3.1. Vehicle Crash History Crash data for the years 2014-2023 was obtained from IDOT. For the Lemont Street crossing area, one crash (rear end) was reported in 2015 at the Canal Street intersection, one crash (fixed object) was reported mid -block and 15 crashes (four rear end, three fixed object, five angle, one sideswipe, one parked vehicle, one no data) were reported at the Main Street intersection. None of the 17 reported crashes in this area involved the railroad crossing according to police reports. For the Stephen Street crossing area, no crashes were reported at the Canal Street intersections. Four crashes (three fixed -object and one parked vehicle) were reported at the Main Street EXHIBIT B cf- Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 orr-ic= 312.372.7346 Fax 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com intersection. None of the four reported crashes in this area involved the railroad crossing according to police reports. 3.2. Pedestrian Incident History Pedestrian incidents do not appear in the IDOT crash data when a vehicle was not involved., but the FRA maintains a database of reported accidents. Each line in the database corresponds to a Form 57 Report and the database currently lists over 247,000 nationwide incidents dating back over 50 years. Additionally, news reports include accidents that are not reported in the RFA database. 3.2.1. Lemont Street According to the FRA database, a pedestrian was struck and killed by a train on May 13, 2015, after reportedly walking around the crossing gate after it had activated. The accident was recorded as a suicide. 3.2.2. Stephen Street According to news reports, a pedestrian was struck and killed by a train on Saturday November 15, 2014, at 2:OOam at the Stephen Street crossing. According to news reports, a pedestrian was struck and killed by an Amtrak train on Tuesday, November 21, 2023, at 8:30am in the vicinity of the Stephen Street crossing. No other details are available. According to the FRA database, a pedestrian was struck and killed by an Amtrak train on Saturday May 25, 2024, at 3:30pm. At the time of the incident, the crossing gates were reportedly operational and the train sounded its warning horn. The incident was recorded as a suicide. 3.2.3. Unknown Location According to news reports, a pedestrian walking on the tracks near Main Street was struck and killed on Wednesday, June 23, 2016, at 6:00 pm. The pedestrian was wearing headphones and the incident was ruled an accident. 3.3. Safety Concerns There is anecdotal evidence of drivers being confused by the layout of the Stephen Street crossing and accidentally driving onto the railroad tracks. Depending on the details and cost of damage of such incidents, they may not be required to be reported to the police, or a crash report may not be required which would explain why those incidents do not appear in the crash reports. Enhanced crossing definition, such as reflective delineators and updated pavement markings, may improve the visibility of the crossing geometry and reduce the likelihood of drivers mistaking the tracks as a roadway. Land use in the study area is a mixture of residential and commercial with a large number of restaurants and shops that attract pedestrians. Multiple fatal accidents have taken place in this area involving trains and pedestrians. Pedestrian safety would be improved by restricting access to the railroad with fencing, improving the warning protection with dedicated pedestrian EXHIBIT B Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 12"' Floor Chicago, IL 60606 omce 312.372.7346 rnx 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com gates and moving the pedestrian crossing located just west of Stephen Street to be closer to the crossing signal. 4. Short -Term Improvements 4.1. Lemont Street The proposed short-term improvements at Lemont Street include delineation bollards and enhanced pavement markings. See the attached drawing for details. 4.1.1. Delineator Bollards Delineator bollards are recommended for installation at all four corners of the crossing as well as centered between the tracks. The railroad may prefer to install a single delineator at each corner of the crossing, but due to the close proximity of the crossing to the intersection at Main Street, one or two additional bollards are recommended in order to increase visibility, especially on the south side of the crossing. The bollards should be installed on the sidewalk behind the curb line so that they do not affect pavement drainage and to make them less likely to be damaged by snow plowing operations. The minimum distance from a bollard to the centerline of the nearest track is six feet. Sections 8C.05 of the MUTCD discusses the usage of tubular markers to supplement edge lines and indicates that they should be the same color as the line that they are intended to supplement. Section 31.02 describes tubular markers and indicates they should be a minimum of 28 inches in height. 4.1.2. Pavement Markings and Signage Sections 313.26 and 8C.06 of the MUTCD discuss pavement markings that can be used at grade crossings to designate the dynamic envelope and areas that should not be blocked. No spacing for the cross hatching is described in the MUTCD, but a detail developed by IDOT, dated 121112020, indicates that the pavement markings should be spaced at eight foot centers. The pavement marking should extend to the stop bar for the railroad crossing or at least eight feet from the crossing gate. If pavement markings are used, the MUTCD indicates that "DO NOT STOP ON TRACKS" (R8-8) signs must also be used. Locations of the R8-8 signs is further described in Section 813.08 of the MUTCD. The R8-8 signs are proposed to be placed on both sides of the crossing for both the northbound and southbound directions. For northbound traffic, the sign may be placed on an existing light pole and the existing railroad crossing signal. For southbound traffic, one sign will be located on the existing railroad signal and the other sign will likely require a new support. The existing stop bar for southbound traffic appears to be approximately six feet from the crossing gate, which is two feet less than the recommended distance, but is fifteen feet from the nearest rail, which meets the recommended distance. The north leg of the intersection at Main Street does not include a stop bar for the railroad crossing. EXHIBIT B ,:f- Lochner 22S West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 ornc_ 312.372.7346 ('Ax 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com The existing painted crosswalk is within approximately four feet of the crossing gate. The proposed pavement markings that will delineate the area where stopping is not recommended extend from the stop bar on the north side of the crossing to the crosswalk south of the crossing. A double -yellow centerline marking is also recommended to be installed from the crosswalk at Canal Street to the crosswalk at Main Street. The pavement markings are not proposed to be placed on the wood crossing surface. "Look for Trains" signs help alert pedestrians to the potential for trains. These signs can be mounted at a lower height to be closer to a pedestrian's eye -line and should be located at a minimum of twelve feet from the nearest rail. This sign is proposed to be installed at all four corners of the crossing. At the northwest corner of the pedestrian crossing, a "Look for Trains" sign is proposed to be installed at the edge of the sidewalk. At the northeast corner, the sign is proposed to be mounted on an existing light pole. At the southwest corner, the sign is proposed to be located at the end of the existing fence near a decorative landscaping stone. At the southeast corner, the sign should be located approximately twelve feet from the nearest rail at the back of the sidewalk but should be placed so that it does not further obstruct access to the railroad bungalow. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) sponsors the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. Providing 24/7, free and confidential support to people in suicidal crisis or emotional distress works. The Lifeline helps thousands of people overcome crisis situations every day through more than 200 local, independent crisis centers in the Lifeline network. There are many versions of signage that can direct anyone considering suicide to accessing the 988 service for help. Signs are proposed at all four quadrants of the crossing. Details for the signs should be developed during design with input from the SAMHSA. 4.1.3. Estimated Cost The estimated cost for the improvements is $7,000, which does not include any permits, easements, railroad flagging or railroad protective insurance. 4.2. Stephen Street The proposed short-term improvements at Stephen Street include delineation bollards and enhanced pavement markings for both the pedestrian crossing and the roadway crossing. See the attached drawing for details. 4.2.1. Delineator Bollards Delineator bollards are recommended for installation at all four corners of both the pedestrian and roadway crossing as well as centered between the tracks. The railroad may prefer to install a single delineator at each corner of the crossing, but due to the close proximity of the crossing to the intersection at Main Street, one or two additional 6 EXHIBIT B (f'- Lochner 225 West Washington Street 11211, Floor Chicago, IL 60606 or-r!ce 312.372.7346 Fax 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com bollards are recommended in order to increase visibility, especially on the south side of the crossing. For the roadway crossing, the bollards should be installed on the sidewalk behind the curb line so that they do not affect pavement drainage and to make them less likely to be damaged by snow plowing operations. The minimum distance from a bollard to the centerline of the nearest track is six feet. Section 8C.05 of the MUTCD discusses the usage of tubular markers to supplement edge lines and indicates that they should be the same color as the line that they are intended to supplement. Section 31.02 describes tubular markers and indicates they should be a minimum of 28 inches in height. 4.2.2. Pavement Markings and Signage Section 8C.06 of the MUTCD discusses pavement markings that can be used at grade crossings to designate the dynamic envelope and areas that should not be blocked. No spacing for the cross hatching is described in the MUTCD, but a detail developed by IDOT, dated 12/1/2020, indicates that the pavement markings should be spaced at eight foot centers. Section 313.26 of the MUTCD discusses pavement markings that are intended to designate areas that should not be blocked. If pavement markings are used, the MUTCD indicates that "DO NOT STOP ON TRACKS" (R8-8) signs must also be used. Locations of the R8-8 signs is further described in Section 813.08 of the MUTCD. These signs are currently in use and no additional R8-8 signs are proposed. A double -yellow centerline marking is also recommended to be installed from Canal Street to Main Street. The pavement markings are not proposed to be placed on the wood crossing surface. "Look for Trains" signs help alert pedestrians to the potential for trains. These signs can be mounted at a lower height to be closer to a pedestrian's eye -line and should be located at a minimum of twelve feet from the nearest rail. Due to the congested area at the southwest corner of the pedestrian crossing, a "Look for Trains" sign is proposed to be mounted on an existing traffic signal pole with the sign facing north. At the northwest corner of the pedestrian crossing, a "Look for Trains" sign is proposed to be installed at the edge of the sidewalk near a landscape wall with the sign facing south. Some trimming of an existing shrub may be necessary to locate the sign as far from the existing tracks as possible. While a twelve foot offset from the nearest rail is the standard minimum, in this area the railroad right of way is very narrow and there are other improvements as close as six feet from the nearest rail. The proposed sign will likely be approximately eight feet from the nearest rail. EXHIBIT B �? Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 12"' Floor Chicago, IL 60606 omca 312.372.7346 FAx 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline signs are proposed at all four quadrants of the crossing. Details for the signs should be developed during design with input from the SAMHSA. 4.2.3. Estimated Cost The estimated cost for the improvements is $7,000, which does not include any permits, easements, railroad flagging or railroad protective insurance. 5. Intermediate Improvements 5.1. Perimeter Fence Pedestrian trespassing on railroad property is a serious safety concern. Perimeter fencing along one or both sides of the railroad corridor through Lemont would help to control access to the tracks. There is some fencing in the project study area of varying height and condition. The proposed fence should be of sufficient height to discourage people from climbing over it The location of the existing right of way was researched through historic plats but its exact location should be verified by a surveyor during design in order to verify ownership of existing fencing and to accurately identify the locations of propose fencing. The American Railway Engineering and Maintenance -of -Way Association (AREMA) manual shows in Figure 28-1-1 a minimum offset from the track centerline to an obstruction, such as a fence, as nine feet plus an adjustment based on curvature. For a 2°-15' curve, the adjustment adds an additional 3.5 inches. The adjustments apply to an obstruction within the curve and generally extending 80 feet past the ends of the curve. Utility records indicate there could be multiple underground utilities, including fiber optic lines, on either side of the tracks and all locations should be verified during design. See the attached drawing for details of the proposed fence improvements. 5.1.1. Metra Station The Metra station property west of Lemont Street is bordered by a five-foot iron fence that is recommended to remain in place. 5.1.2. West of Lemont Street, South Side of Tracks Along the south side of the tracks west of Lemont Street there is a short chain -link fence which extends from the end of the fence at the Metra property to Lemont Street. The fence is too short to manage access to the railroad tracks and should be replaced with a taller fence. It appears that the fence can be located on private property including commercial properties to the west and a park to the east. Access for construction behind a few buildings will need to be from the railroad property. Although the fence is continuous across multiple properties, its ownership is not clear. 0 EXHIBIT B cf' Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 omr_e 312.372.7346 Fnx 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com The east end of the fence should be designed to accommodate the long-term improvements, which include sidewalk widening and a swing gate. 5.1.3. East of Lemont Street, North Side of Tracks There is a short section of fence between Lemont Street and a building along a restaurant patio area that is too short to manage access and is proposed to be replaced with a taller fence. The fence is likely owned by the building owner but may actually be located on railroad property. The replacement fence is not recommended to extend behind the building since the clearance to the railroad tracks is already restricted. 5.1.4. East of Lemont Street, South Side of Tracks Fencing is proposed along the south right of way line of the tracks from Lemont Street to Stephen Street, preferably within the Main Street right of way. The fence should be located north of the landscaping installations, fire hydrants and streetlights. There is a railroad signal cabinet near Lemont Street that is accessed from the side of the structure that faces the track. The proposed fence will not affect the signal cabinet. There is also a crossing signal for westbound traffic on Main Street in this area. The end of the fence should be located such that the driver's sight line to the signal is not obscured for a vehicle at the intersection stop bar. The right of way narrows near Stephen Street and it may be difficult to accommodate the fence between the track and Main Street. It may not be possible to extend the fence all the way to Stephen Street and meet the clearance requirement. The long- term improvement includes a shift of the pavement in this area that will provide more space for a fence. 5.1.5. West of Stephen Street, North Side of Tracks Fencing is proposed along the south side of the park in this area. Existing landscaping features appear very close to the right of way line and if the fence is designed to avoid impacting the landscaping it may be very close to the minimum clearance. The fence is proposed to be north of the railroad right of way on public property. 5.1.6. East of Stephen Street, North Side of Tracks Fencing is proposed along two parking lots in this area. The terrain is much lower behind some private residences further east and the potential for trespassing is much lower. The fence is proposed to be north of the railroad right of way on private and public property. There are some landscaping plants in this area that will be located on the railroad side of the fence and they may need to be removed if requested by the railroad. 5.1.7. East of Stephen Street, South Side of Tracks Fencing is proposed along the south right of way line of the tracks from Stephen Street to Holmes Street. The fence should be located north of the landscaping installations, fire hydrants and streetlights, preferably in the Main Street right of way. 5.1.8. Estimated Cost EXHIBIT B (fp- Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 oFFic- 312.372.7346 FAx 312.372.8208 hwiochner.com The estimated cost for the improvements is $260,000, which is based on a slightly elevated unit cost for fence that reflects the likely need for railroad flagging and railroad protective insurance. The costs for any permits or easements is not included. 6. Long -Term Improvements 6.1. Lemont Street The proposed long-term improvements at Lemont Street include delineation bollards, enhanced pavement markings, four -quadrant combination crossing gates and self -closing swing gates. See the attached drawing for details. 6.1.1. Delineator Bollards The delineator bollards should be similar to those proposed in the short-term improvements and may already have been installed as part of the short-term improvements. It should be assumed that the bollards will be impacted by the long- term improvements and will all need to be replaced. 6.1.2. Pavement Markings and Signage The proposed improvements include the same "do not block" area as proposed in the short-term improvements. In addition, the southbound stop bar is proposed to be shifted north to provide an eight —foot offset to the replacement crossing gate. The crosswalk south of the crossing is proposed to be located four feet from the replacement crossing gate and painted with high -visibility markings. The "Look for Trains" signs that are recommended as part of the short-term improvements will need to be relocated due to conflicts with proposed sidewalk widening. "DO NOT STOP ON TRACKS" signs are proposed at all four quadrants of the crossing. 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline signs are proposed at all four quadrants of the crossing. Details for the signs should be developed during design with input from the SAIVIHSA. 6.1.3. Combination Crossing Gates Four -quadrant combination gates are proposed. The minimum offset to the crossing gates is fifteen feet as measured from the nearest track centerline. The installation also includes a pedestrian gate in all four corners of the crossing. The minimum offset from the face -of -curb to the signal is two feet and the minimum offset to the center of the support pole is 4 feet, 1 inch. The clear zone for pedestrians adjacent to the signal pole is 4 feet, 6 inches as measured from the center of the support pole 6.1.4. Swing Gates Self -closing swing gates are an optional enhancement to pedestrian crossing gates and allow for an egress in an emergency for a pedestrian who is not capable of crossing under the gate arm. It should be noted that the fifteen foot offset to the gate arm 10 EXHIBIT B ,:f- Lochner 225 West Washington Street 112t" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 OFF7C 312.372.7346 FAx 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com allows for a refuge area. Due to the restricted right of way, a swing gate is not possible in the northeast quadrant, but they are recommended in the other three quadrants. 6.1.5. Sidewalk Improvements The self -closing gate requires additional sidewalk or paved area in order to meet ADA/PROWAG requirements. The proposed improvements include removing materials from all four quadrants of the crossing so that the paved area can be widened. The wood crossing surface appears to be wide enough to accommodate the improvements. The sidewalk improvements and adjusted crosswalk may require replacement of the ADA curb ramps south of the crossing. No changes to the corner radii are proposed. 6.1.6. Perimeter Fence In the southwest quadrant of the crossing, there is an existing fence. Approximately six feet of fence will need to be removed to accommodate the swing gate and widened sidewalk. In the northwest quadrant of the crossing, approximately ten feet of fence are proposed to close the gap between the existing Metra property fence and the proposed swing gate. In the southeast quadrant of the crossing, approximately sixteen feet of fence are proposed to close the gap between the proposed fence along Main Street and the proposed swing gate. There is a railroad signal cabinet near Lemont Street that is accessed from the side of the structure that faces the track. The proposed fence will not affect the signal cabinet. There is also a crossing signal for westbound traffic on Main Street in this area. The proposed fence should be located such that the driver's sight line to the signal is not obscured for a vehicle at the intersection stop bar. 6.1.7. Landscaping Rock In the southwest quadrant of the crossing, there is an existing decorative landscaping rock that is painted with an American flag. The rock will need to be slightly relocated to accommodate the widened sidewalk and swing gate. 6.1.8. Traffic Control The existing intersection of Lemont Street and Main Street is controlled by stop signs on all four legs. The stop sign on southbound Lemont Street is located north of the railroad tracks and the stop bar is approximately 70 feet north of the edge of the through travel lane on Main Street. From field observations, it was noted that southbound drivers typically stopped at the stop sign and then slowly approached the intersection. Drivers then had confirmed that traffic on Main Street was stopped before entering the intersection. 24-hour traffic data was gathered on Wednesday, March 6, 2024 and Saturday, March 9, 2024. A capacity study was completed that shows that the four-way, stop -controlled intersection operates at Level of Service A in the AM peak hour and Level of Service B in 11 EXHIBIT B cf- Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 om(- 312,372.7346 FAX 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com the PM peak hour. The maximum queue along Main Street is predicted to be three vehicles in each direction and one car in each direction on Lemont Street. The data from March 6 was used in the signal warrant study. The traffic volumes, crash statistics, adjacent land use and roadway network do not satisfy any of the eight signal warrants that are based on those issues. Additional consideration was given to Warrant 9, which addresses intersections near railroad grade crossings. The intent of Warrant 9 is to prevent queued vehicles from being trapped on a crossing when a train approaches. The geometric condition that must be met is to when there is a stop or yield sign downstream of the grade crossing within 140 feet of the tracks. Two characteristics of the existing intersection result in the geometric requirements not being present. First, the stop control for southbound traffic on Lemont Street is located upstream of the tracks, and the queue for stopped vehicles is not located across the tracks. Second, traffic along Main Street is stop - controlled at Lemont Street and since traffic is forced to stop, the potential for developing a queue on Lemont Street is not probably. The requirements for Warrant 9 are therefore not satisfied. An option to change the southbound movement to free -flow was considered. The benefit to this option is that southbound vehicles will not have to slow or stop on the tracks while waiting for traffic on Main Street to clear the intersection. The major drawback is that traffic on Main Street will instinctually expect southbound traffic to stop and the risk for crashes is increased. The placement of the stop sign north of the tracks appears to be effective at reducing the chance for a stopped vehicle to be on the tracks since it forces the stop queue to be located north of the tracks. The potential for a car to be stopped on the tracks therefore appears to be low and is not considered a higher risk than the potential for crashes due to driver misunderstanding of the free - flow movement. No change to the traffic control is recommended. 6.1.9. Estimated Cost The estimated cost for the improvements is $700,000. The costs for any permits or easements is not included. 6.2. Stephen Street The proposed long-term improvements at Stephen Street include a pavement shift, delineation bollards, enhanced pavement markings, four -quadrant combination crossing gates and self - closing swing gates. See the attached drawing for details. 6.2.1. Main Street Improvements The existing railroad crossing is undesirably close to Main Street. The proposed improvements include removing the on -street parking along the south side of Main Street from 215 feet west of Stephen Street to 215 feet east of Stephen Street. The 12 EXHIBIT B Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 12t" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 once 312.372.7346 FAX 312,372,8208 hwlochner.com through lanes in this area are proposed to be shifted eight feet to the south using 20:1 tapers (160 feet). Approximately twelve parking spaces will be eliminated. A tangent section approximately 25 feet long is proposed on each approach on Main Street in advance of the proposed stop bars. The resulting roadway will be 24 feet wide which is less than the standard 30 foot width and a design exception may be required from IDOT depending on the project's funding source. The curb and gutter and pavement along the north side of Main Street are proposed to be removed in this area and replaced with new curb and gutter along the shifted north edge of pavement. The drainage structures along the north side of Main Street in this area that will need to be relocated. 6.2.2. Combination Crossing Gates Four -quadrant gates are proposed. The minimum offset to the crossing gates is fifteen feet as measured from the nearest track centerline. The installation includes pedestrian gates in the northeast and southeast quadrants. Due to site restrictions, the crossing signals in the northwest and southwest quadrants are located at the back of the sidewalk and the gate arms will cross both the street and the sidewalk. The minimum offset from the face -of -curb to the signal is two feet and the minimum offset to the center of the support pole is 4 feet, 1 inch. The clear zone for pedestrians adjacent to the signal pole is 4 feet, 6 inches as measured from the center of the support pole. 6.2.3. Swing Gates Self -closing swing gates are an optional enhancement to pedestrian crossing gates and allow for an egress in an emergency for a pedestrian who is not capable of crossing under the gate arm. Swing gates are proposed in all four quadrants. 6.2.4. Sidewalk Improvements The self -closing gate requires additional sidewalk or paved area in order to meet ADA/PROWAG requirements. The proposed improvements include removing materials from all four quadrants of the crossing so that the paved area can be widened. The wood crossing surface appears to be wide enough to accommodate the improvements. In the northwest quadrant, the existing pedestrian crossing is located undesirably far from Stephen Street and the warning signals are ineffective at controlling pedestrian movements. The crossing from the park area is proposed to be closed. New sidewalk is proposed behind the curb beginning at the park on Canal Street and continuing south along Stephen Street. The sidewalk improvement may require the removal of some landscaping plants and the adjustment of a utility structure. The sidewalk widening to accommodate the pedestrian swing gate will require moving a streetlight pole and an electrical transformer. Railings are recommended to provide protection for the railroad crossing gate arm counterweight. 13 EXHIBIT B Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 12' Floor Chicago, IL 60606 nrric 312.372.7346 Fax 312,372,8208 hwlochner.com In the southwest quadrant, the proposed improvements include a new sidewalk behind the relocated curb. The old sidewalk is proposed to be removed. Railings are recommended to provide protection for the railroad gate arm counterweight. In the northeast quadrant, the sidewalk widening for the swing gate will require the removal of a landscaping fence, a low railing and an abandoned signal foundation. In the southeast quadrant, the proposed improvements include removal and replacement of the sidewalk. 6.2.5. Delineator Bollards The delineator bollards should be similar to those proposed in the short-term improvements and may already have been installed as part of the short-term improvements. It should be assumed that the bollards will be impacted by the long- term improvements and will all need to be replaced. 6.2.6. Pavement Markings and Signage The proposed improvements include the same "do not block" area as proposed in the short-term improvements. The "Look for Trains" signs that are recommended as part of the short-term improvements will need to be relocated due to conflicts with proposed sidewalk widening and due to the existing pedestrian crossing being shifted closer to Stephen Street. "DO NOT STOP ON TRACKS" signs are proposed at all four quadrants of the crossing. 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline signs are proposed at all four quadrants of the crossing. Details for the signs should be developed during design with input from the SAMHSA. 6.2.7. Perimeter Fence In the northwest quadrant of the crossing, approximately 25 feet of fence are proposed to close the gap between the intermediate fence and the proposed swing gate. In the southwest quadrant of the crossing, there is an existing fence. Approximately six feet of fence will need to be removed to accommodate the swing gate and widened sidewalk. In the northeast quadrant, approximately twenty feet of fence a proposed to be constructed at the back of the sidewalk along Stephen Street. In the southwest quadrant of the crossing, approximately 35 feet of fence are proposed to close the gap between the intermediate fence and the proposed swing gate. The fence should be located to avoid blocking the existing traffic signal handholds. 14 EXHIBIT B cf' Lochner 225 West Washington Street 1 121" Floor Chicago, IL 60606 OFFICE 312,372.7346 FAx 312.372.8208 hwlochner.com In the southeast quadrant of the crossing, approximately six feet of fence are proposed to close the gap between the intermediate fence and the proposed swing gate. 6.2.8. Traffic Control The existing intersection of Stephen Street and Main Street is controlled by a traffic signal which is interconnected with the railroad crossing signals. The traffic signal controlling southbound traffic on Stephen Street is located both north and south of the railroad tracks. The proposed improvements include removing the signal poles in the northwest and northeast quadrants of the intersection and replacing them with new poles that are shifted south to be near the relocated curb line. Pedestrian heads and pushbuttons should be added to the signal pole in the northwest quadrant of the intersection for southbound pedestrian volumes. 24-hour traffic data was gathered on Wednesday, March 6, 2024 and Saturday, March 9, 2024. A capacity study was completed using the mid -week data and it shows that the intersection operates at Level of Service B in both the AM and PM peak hours. 6.2.9. Estimated Cost The estimated cost for the improvements is $1,200,000. The costs for any permits or easements is not included. 15 I � c I - Q I x ZO w - f— i � wow i Z I O 3 I � x v I � I U ' o �, i Al ,t, : ob_k Lid r MATCHI LINE LOWER PANEL g IT i I 'p I o I1 3 i i m, I I 1 o I eI ! is i J4 I W 01, wl via- W W i W O � wow MATCH LINE UPPER PANEL TI- � � 1a I O p x Z < Q w _I s� 1; J � Z O w UQ t I I ! � I ! i C I x G I r �I I - U I 1 IS C Z Z H C ^ w Wo N c i = i V. I s jL _Ia u 1 e � z • z� STEPHEN ST �5TEPHEN ST ° IIi W w i e c C m 1 I I J � � Ctf i m